TSTP Solution File: CSR115+17 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+17 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.82s 2.85s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.82s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 21 RR)
% Number of literals : 61 ( 0 equ; 50 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 72 ( 42 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_773,negated_conjecture,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3q2i7wp1/input.p',i_0_773) ).
cnf(i_0_729,plain,
( sub(esk49_3(X1,X2,X3),name_1_1)
| ~ prop(X1,X2)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3q2i7wp1/input.p',i_0_729) ).
cnf(i_0_732,plain,
( attr(esk48_3(X1,X2,X3),esk49_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ prop(X1,X2)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3q2i7wp1/input.p',i_0_732) ).
cnf(i_0_535,plain,
state_adjective_state_binding(britisch__1_1,grossbritannien_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3q2i7wp1/input.p',i_0_535) ).
cnf(i_0_284,hypothesis,
prop(c175,britisch__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3q2i7wp1/input.p',i_0_284) ).
cnf(i_0_285,hypothesis,
attr(c175,c176),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3q2i7wp1/input.p',i_0_285) ).
cnf(c_0_780,negated_conjecture,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1) ),
i_0_773 ).
cnf(c_0_781,plain,
( sub(esk49_3(X1,X2,X3),name_1_1)
| ~ prop(X1,X2)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3) ),
i_0_729 ).
cnf(c_0_782,negated_conjecture,
( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,esk49_3(X4,X1,X2))
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X7,X8)
| ~ prop(X4,X1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_780,c_0_781]) ).
cnf(c_0_783,plain,
( attr(esk48_3(X1,X2,X3),esk49_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ prop(X1,X2)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3) ),
i_0_732 ).
cnf(c_0_784,plain,
( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ prop(X7,X1)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_782,c_0_783]) ).
cnf(c_0_785,plain,
( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X1,X2)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,esk49_3(X6,X3,X4))
| ~ attr(X7,X8)
| ~ prop(X9,X1)
| ~ prop(X6,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_784,c_0_781]) ).
cnf(c_0_786,plain,
( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X1,X2)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ prop(X7,X1)
| ~ prop(X8,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_785,c_0_783]) ).
cnf(c_0_787,plain,
state_adjective_state_binding(britisch__1_1,grossbritannien_0),
i_0_535 ).
cnf(c_0_788,plain,
( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ prop(X5,britisch__1_1)
| ~ prop(X6,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_786,c_0_787]) ).
cnf(c_0_789,hypothesis,
prop(c175,britisch__1_1),
i_0_284 ).
cnf(c_0_790,hypothesis,
( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ prop(X5,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_788,c_0_789]) ).
cnf(c_0_791,plain,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ prop(X3,britisch__1_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_790,c_0_787]) ).
cnf(c_0_792,hypothesis,
attr(c175,c176),
i_0_285 ).
cnf(c_0_793,hypothesis,
~ attr(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_791,c_0_789]) ).
cnf(c_0_794,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_792,c_0_793]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : CSR115+17 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.08/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 00:23:21 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.44/0.62 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.44/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.44/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.82/2.85 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 7.82/2.85 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.82/2.85 # Preprocessing time : 0.039 s
% 7.82/2.85
% 7.82/2.85 # Proof found!
% 7.82/2.85 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.82/2.85 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.82/2.85 # Proof object total steps : 21
% 7.82/2.85 # Proof object clause steps : 15
% 7.82/2.85 # Proof object formula steps : 6
% 7.82/2.85 # Proof object conjectures : 3
% 7.82/2.85 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 7.82/2.85 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 7.82/2.85 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 7.82/2.85 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 7.82/2.85 # Proof object generating inferences : 8
% 7.82/2.85 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 7.82/2.85 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.82/2.85 # Parsed axioms : 793
% 7.82/2.85 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.82/2.85 # Initial clauses : 793
% 7.82/2.85 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.82/2.85 # Initial clauses in saturation : 793
% 7.82/2.85 # Processed clauses : 940
% 7.82/2.85 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 7.82/2.85 # ...subsumed : 6
% 7.82/2.85 # ...remaining for further processing : 934
% 7.82/2.85 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 7.82/2.85 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.82/2.85 # Backward-subsumed : 40
% 7.82/2.85 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 7.82/2.85 # Generated clauses : 882
% 7.82/2.85 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 875
% 7.82/2.85 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 10
% 7.82/2.85 # Paramodulations : 879
% 7.82/2.85 # Factorizations : 0
% 7.82/2.85 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 7.82/2.85 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.82/2.85 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 7.82/2.85 # Current number of processed clauses : 891
% 7.82/2.85 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 518
% 7.82/2.85 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.82/2.85 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 7.82/2.85 # Non-unit-clauses : 372
% 7.82/2.85 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 724
% 7.82/2.85 # ...number of literals in the above : 2835
% 7.82/2.85 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.82/2.85 # Current number of archived clauses : 43
% 7.82/2.85 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 35181
% 7.82/2.85 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10695
% 7.82/2.85 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 56
% 7.82/2.85 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1595
% 7.82/2.85 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.82/2.85 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 7.82/2.85 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 7.82/2.85 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.82/2.85 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.82/2.85 # Termbank termtop insertions : 26740
% 7.82/2.85
% 7.82/2.85 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.82/2.85 # User time : 0.078 s
% 7.82/2.85 # System time : 0.009 s
% 7.82/2.85 # Total time : 0.087 s
% 7.82/2.85 # ...preprocessing : 0.039 s
% 7.82/2.85 # ...main loop : 0.048 s
% 7.82/2.85 # Maximum resident set size: 9180 pages
% 7.82/2.85
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------