TSTP Solution File: CSR115+14 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+14 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.86s 2.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.86s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 28 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 28 RR)
% Number of literals : 78 ( 0 equ; 61 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 68 ( 37 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_763,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-re9eh3r_/lgb.p',i_0_763) ).
cnf(i_0_274,hypothesis,
val(c54239,bmw_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-re9eh3r_/lgb.p',i_0_274) ).
cnf(i_0_275,hypothesis,
sub(c54239,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-re9eh3r_/lgb.p',i_0_275) ).
cnf(i_0_277,hypothesis,
sub(c53524,firma_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-re9eh3r_/lgb.p',i_0_277) ).
cnf(i_0_278,hypothesis,
attr(c53524,c54239),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-re9eh3r_/lgb.p',i_0_278) ).
cnf(i_0_742,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-re9eh3r_/lgb.p',i_0_742) ).
cnf(i_0_759,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-re9eh3r_/lgb.p',i_0_759) ).
cnf(i_0_761,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-re9eh3r_/lgb.p',i_0_761) ).
cnf(i_0_760,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-re9eh3r_/lgb.p',i_0_760) ).
cnf(c_0_773,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0) ),
i_0_763 ).
cnf(c_0_774,hypothesis,
val(c54239,bmw_0),
i_0_274 ).
cnf(c_0_775,hypothesis,
sub(c54239,name_1_1),
i_0_275 ).
cnf(c_0_776,hypothesis,
( ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
| ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,c54239)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ obj(X6,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_773,c_0_774]),c_0_775])]) ).
cnf(c_0_777,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,c54239)
| ~ attr(X2,c54239)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ obj(X5,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_776,c_0_774]),c_0_775])]) ).
cnf(c_0_778,hypothesis,
sub(c53524,firma_1_1),
i_0_277 ).
cnf(c_0_779,hypothesis,
attr(c53524,c54239),
i_0_278 ).
cnf(c_0_780,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c54239)
| ~ attr(X2,X3)
| ~ obj(X4,c53524) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_777,c_0_778]),c_0_779])]) ).
cnf(c_0_781,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,X2)
| ~ obj(X3,c53524) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_780,c_0_779]) ).
cnf(c_0_782,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
i_0_742 ).
cnf(c_0_783,plain,
( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X1,X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,c53524)
| ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_781,c_0_782]) ).
cnf(c_0_784,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_759 ).
cnf(c_0_785,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c53524)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X4,X5) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_783,c_0_784]) ).
cnf(c_0_786,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_761 ).
cnf(c_0_787,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(c53524,X1),X2)
| ~ sub(c53524,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_785,c_0_786]) ).
cnf(c_0_788,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_760 ).
cnf(c_0_789,plain,
( ~ sub(c53524,X1)
| ~ attr(X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_787,c_0_788]) ).
cnf(c_0_790,hypothesis,
~ attr(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_789,c_0_778]) ).
cnf(c_0_791,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_779,c_0_790]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR115+14 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 17:26:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.44/0.62 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.44/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.44/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.86/2.62 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.86/2.62 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.86/2.62 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.86/2.62 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.86/2.62 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.86/2.62 #
% 7.86/2.62 # Preprocessing time : 0.030 s
% 7.86/2.62 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.86/2.62
% 7.86/2.62 # Proof found!
% 7.86/2.62 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.86/2.62 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.86/2.62 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.86/2.62
% 7.86/2.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.86/2.62 # User time : 0.055 s
% 7.86/2.62 # System time : 0.011 s
% 7.86/2.62 # Total time : 0.066 s
% 7.86/2.62 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.86/2.62
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------