TSTP Solution File: CSR115+11 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR115+11 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.59s 2.72s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.59s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 14
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 41 ( 19 unt; 0 nHn; 41 RR)
% Number of literals : 124 ( 0 equ; 97 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 9 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 11 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 82 ( 30 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_820,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ val(X4,X8)
| ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0)
| ~ has_card_leq(X8,int1994) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6arkki11/lgb.p',i_0_820) ).
cnf(i_0_642,plain,
( has_card_leq(X1,X2)
| ~ card(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6arkki11/lgb.p',i_0_642) ).
cnf(i_0_252,hypothesis,
card(c20306,int1994),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6arkki11/lgb.p',i_0_252) ).
cnf(i_0_321,hypothesis,
sub(c20611,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6arkki11/lgb.p',i_0_321) ).
cnf(i_0_320,hypothesis,
val(c20611,bmw_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6arkki11/lgb.p',i_0_320) ).
cnf(i_0_325,hypothesis,
sub(c20313,jahr__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6arkki11/lgb.p',i_0_325) ).
cnf(i_0_324,hypothesis,
val(c20313,c20306),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6arkki11/lgb.p',i_0_324) ).
cnf(i_0_322,hypothesis,
sub(c20610,firma_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6arkki11/lgb.p',i_0_322) ).
cnf(i_0_323,hypothesis,
attr(c20610,c20611),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6arkki11/lgb.p',i_0_323) ).
cnf(i_0_326,hypothesis,
attr(c20312,c20313),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6arkki11/lgb.p',i_0_326) ).
cnf(i_0_799,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6arkki11/lgb.p',i_0_799) ).
cnf(i_0_816,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6arkki11/lgb.p',i_0_816) ).
cnf(i_0_817,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6arkki11/lgb.p',i_0_817) ).
cnf(i_0_818,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6arkki11/lgb.p',i_0_818) ).
cnf(c_0_835,negated_conjecture,
( ~ obj(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X6)
| ~ attr(X2,X7)
| ~ val(X4,X8)
| ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X6,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X7,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X6,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X7,bmw_0)
| ~ has_card_leq(X8,int1994) ),
i_0_820 ).
cnf(c_0_836,plain,
( has_card_leq(X1,X2)
| ~ card(X1,X2) ),
i_0_642 ).
cnf(c_0_837,plain,
( ~ card(X1,int1994)
| ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X2,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X3,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X4,X1)
| ~ attr(X6,X3)
| ~ attr(X7,X4)
| ~ attr(X5,X2)
| ~ obj(X8,X5) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_835,c_0_836]) ).
cnf(c_0_838,hypothesis,
card(c20306,int1994),
i_0_252 ).
cnf(c_0_839,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X2,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X3,c20306)
| ~ attr(X5,X2)
| ~ attr(X6,X3)
| ~ attr(X4,X1)
| ~ obj(X7,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_837,c_0_838]) ).
cnf(c_0_840,hypothesis,
sub(c20611,name_1_1),
i_0_321 ).
cnf(c_0_841,hypothesis,
val(c20611,bmw_0),
i_0_320 ).
cnf(c_0_842,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X1,bmw_0)
| ~ val(X2,c20306)
| ~ attr(X3,c20611)
| ~ attr(X4,X1)
| ~ attr(X5,X2)
| ~ obj(X6,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_839,c_0_840]),c_0_841])]) ).
cnf(c_0_843,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,jahr__1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,firma_1_1)
| ~ val(X1,c20306)
| ~ attr(X2,c20611)
| ~ attr(X3,c20611)
| ~ attr(X4,X1)
| ~ obj(X5,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_842,c_0_840]),c_0_841])]) ).
cnf(c_0_844,hypothesis,
sub(c20313,jahr__1_1),
i_0_325 ).
cnf(c_0_845,hypothesis,
val(c20313,c20306),
i_0_324 ).
cnf(c_0_846,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,firma_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,c20611)
| ~ attr(X2,c20611)
| ~ attr(X3,c20313)
| ~ obj(X4,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_843,c_0_844]),c_0_845])]) ).
cnf(c_0_847,hypothesis,
sub(c20610,firma_1_1),
i_0_322 ).
cnf(c_0_848,hypothesis,
attr(c20610,c20611),
i_0_323 ).
cnf(c_0_849,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c20611)
| ~ attr(X2,c20313)
| ~ obj(X3,c20610) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_846,c_0_847]),c_0_848])]) ).
cnf(c_0_850,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c20313)
| ~ obj(X2,c20610) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_849,c_0_848]) ).
cnf(c_0_851,hypothesis,
attr(c20312,c20313),
i_0_326 ).
cnf(c_0_852,hypothesis,
~ obj(X1,c20610),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_850,c_0_851]) ).
cnf(c_0_853,plain,
( obj(esk54_3(X1,X2,X3),X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,X2)
| ~ arg2(X1,X3)
| ~ subr(X1,sub_0) ),
i_0_799 ).
cnf(c_0_854,plain,
( ~ subr(X1,sub_0)
| ~ arg2(X1,X2)
| ~ arg1(X1,c20610) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_852,c_0_853]) ).
cnf(c_0_855,plain,
( subr(esk59_2(X1,X2),sub_0)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_816 ).
cnf(c_0_856,plain,
( ~ arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c20610)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_854,c_0_855]) ).
cnf(c_0_857,plain,
( arg2(esk59_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_817 ).
cnf(c_0_858,plain,
( ~ arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),c20610)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_856,c_0_857]) ).
cnf(c_0_859,plain,
( arg1(esk59_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ sub(X1,X2) ),
i_0_818 ).
cnf(c_0_860,plain,
~ sub(c20610,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_858,c_0_859]) ).
cnf(c_0_861,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_847,c_0_860]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : CSR115+11 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 14:20:39 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.42/0.59 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.42/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.42/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.42/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.59/2.72 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.59/2.72 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.59/2.72 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.59/2.72 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.59/2.72 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.59/2.72 #
% 7.59/2.72 # Preprocessing time : 0.029 s
% 7.59/2.72 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.59/2.72
% 7.59/2.72 # Proof found!
% 7.59/2.72 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.59/2.72 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.59/2.72 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.59/2.72
% 7.59/2.72 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.59/2.72 # User time : 0.053 s
% 7.59/2.72 # System time : 0.006 s
% 7.59/2.72 # Total time : 0.059 s
% 7.59/2.72 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.59/2.72
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------