TSTP Solution File: CSR114+7 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR114+7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:11 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.85s 2.78s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.85s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 30 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 30 RR)
% Number of literals : 62 ( 0 equ; 41 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 48 ( 16 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_820,negated_conjecture,
( ~ loc(X1,X2)
| ~ scar(X1,X3)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-obtuhblu/lgb.p',i_0_820) ).
cnf(i_0_326,hypothesis,
val(c782,rom_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-obtuhblu/lgb.p',i_0_326) ).
cnf(i_0_327,hypothesis,
sub(c782,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-obtuhblu/lgb.p',i_0_327) ).
cnf(i_0_328,hypothesis,
sub(c781,stadt__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-obtuhblu/lgb.p',i_0_328) ).
cnf(i_0_329,hypothesis,
attr(c781,c782),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-obtuhblu/lgb.p',i_0_329) ).
cnf(i_0_687,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-obtuhblu/lgb.p',i_0_687) ).
cnf(i_0_688,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-obtuhblu/lgb.p',i_0_688) ).
cnf(i_0_689,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-obtuhblu/lgb.p',i_0_689) ).
cnf(i_0_778,plain,
( loc(X1,esk50_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ prop(X1,X2)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-obtuhblu/lgb.p',i_0_778) ).
cnf(i_0_582,plain,
state_adjective_state_binding(italienisch__1_1,italien_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-obtuhblu/lgb.p',i_0_582) ).
cnf(i_0_322,hypothesis,
prop(c795,italienisch__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-obtuhblu/lgb.p',i_0_322) ).
cnf(c_0_832,negated_conjecture,
( ~ loc(X1,X2)
| ~ scar(X1,X3)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
i_0_820 ).
cnf(c_0_833,hypothesis,
val(c782,rom_0),
i_0_326 ).
cnf(c_0_834,hypothesis,
sub(c782,name_1_1),
i_0_327 ).
cnf(c_0_835,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ subs(X2,stehen_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,c782)
| ~ scar(X2,X3)
| ~ loc(X2,X4) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_832,c_0_833]),c_0_834])]) ).
cnf(c_0_836,hypothesis,
sub(c781,stadt__1_1),
i_0_328 ).
cnf(c_0_837,hypothesis,
attr(c781,c782),
i_0_329 ).
cnf(c_0_838,hypothesis,
( ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_835,c_0_836]),c_0_837])]) ).
cnf(c_0_839,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_687 ).
cnf(c_0_840,plain,
( ~ scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X4)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_838,c_0_839]) ).
cnf(c_0_841,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_688 ).
cnf(c_0_842,plain,
( ~ loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_840,c_0_841]) ).
cnf(c_0_843,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_689 ).
cnf(c_0_844,plain,
~ loc(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_842,c_0_843]) ).
cnf(c_0_845,plain,
( loc(X1,esk50_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ prop(X1,X2)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3) ),
i_0_778 ).
cnf(c_0_846,plain,
( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X1,X2)
| ~ prop(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_844,c_0_845]) ).
cnf(c_0_847,plain,
state_adjective_state_binding(italienisch__1_1,italien_0),
i_0_582 ).
cnf(c_0_848,hypothesis,
prop(c795,italienisch__1_1),
i_0_322 ).
cnf(c_0_849,plain,
~ prop(X1,italienisch__1_1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_846,c_0_847]) ).
cnf(c_0_850,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_848,c_0_849]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR114+7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 04:56:30 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.37/0.62 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.37/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.37/0.62 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.85/2.78 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.85/2.78 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.85/2.78 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.85/2.78 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.85/2.78 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.85/2.78 #
% 7.85/2.78 # Preprocessing time : 0.030 s
% 7.85/2.78 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.85/2.78
% 7.85/2.78 # Proof found!
% 7.85/2.78 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.85/2.78 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.85/2.78 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.85/2.78
% 7.85/2.78 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.85/2.78 # User time : 0.057 s
% 7.85/2.78 # System time : 0.007 s
% 7.85/2.78 # Total time : 0.064 s
% 7.85/2.78 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 7.85/2.78
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------