TSTP Solution File: CSR114+5 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR114+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:10 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.30s 2.74s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.30s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 27 RR)
% Number of literals : 66 ( 0 equ; 45 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_728,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(X3,X1)
| ~ scar(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X2,X5)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wvr4ksld/input.p',i_0_728) ).
cnf(i_0_232,hypothesis,
val(c43,rom_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wvr4ksld/input.p',i_0_232) ).
cnf(i_0_233,hypothesis,
sub(c43,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wvr4ksld/input.p',i_0_233) ).
cnf(i_0_596,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wvr4ksld/input.p',i_0_596) ).
cnf(i_0_595,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wvr4ksld/input.p',i_0_595) ).
cnf(i_0_597,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wvr4ksld/input.p',i_0_597) ).
cnf(i_0_237,hypothesis,
loc(c34,c79),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wvr4ksld/input.p',i_0_237) ).
cnf(i_0_236,hypothesis,
sub(c34,kolosseum_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wvr4ksld/input.p',i_0_236) ).
cnf(i_0_224,hypothesis,
in(c79,c42),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wvr4ksld/input.p',i_0_224) ).
cnf(i_0_235,hypothesis,
attr(c42,c43),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wvr4ksld/input.p',i_0_235) ).
cnf(i_0_234,hypothesis,
sub(c42,stadt__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-wvr4ksld/input.p',i_0_234) ).
cnf(c_0_740,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(X3,X1)
| ~ scar(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X2,X5)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
i_0_728 ).
cnf(c_0_741,hypothesis,
val(c43,rom_0),
i_0_232 ).
cnf(c_0_742,hypothesis,
sub(c43,name_1_1),
i_0_233 ).
cnf(c_0_743,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,c43)
| ~ sub(X2,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X3,stadt__1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X4)
| ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ in(X4,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_740,c_0_741]),c_0_742])]) ).
cnf(c_0_744,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_596 ).
cnf(c_0_745,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_595 ).
cnf(c_0_746,plain,
( ~ attr(X1,c43)
| ~ sub(X2,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ loc(esk27_2(X2,X3),X4)
| ~ loc(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X4,X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_743,c_0_744]),c_0_745]) ).
cnf(c_0_747,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_597 ).
cnf(c_0_748,plain,
( ~ attr(X1,c43)
| ~ sub(X2,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ loc(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_746,c_0_747]) ).
cnf(c_0_749,hypothesis,
loc(c34,c79),
i_0_237 ).
cnf(c_0_750,hypothesis,
sub(c34,kolosseum_1_1),
i_0_236 ).
cnf(c_0_751,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c43)
| ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ in(c79,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_748,c_0_749]),c_0_750])]) ).
cnf(c_0_752,hypothesis,
in(c79,c42),
i_0_224 ).
cnf(c_0_753,hypothesis,
attr(c42,c43),
i_0_235 ).
cnf(c_0_754,hypothesis,
sub(c42,stadt__1_1),
i_0_234 ).
cnf(c_0_755,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_751,c_0_752]),c_0_753]),c_0_754])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : CSR114+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 11:57:45 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.43 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.58 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.58 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.30/2.74 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 8.30/2.74 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.30/2.74 # Preprocessing time : 0.026 s
% 8.30/2.74
% 8.30/2.74 # Proof found!
% 8.30/2.74 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.30/2.74 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.30/2.74 # Proof object total steps : 27
% 8.30/2.74 # Proof object clause steps : 16
% 8.30/2.74 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 8.30/2.74 # Proof object conjectures : 3
% 8.30/2.74 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 8.30/2.74 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 8.30/2.74 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 8.30/2.74 # Proof object initial formulas used : 11
% 8.30/2.74 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 8.30/2.74 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 8
% 8.30/2.74 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.30/2.74 # Parsed axioms : 748
% 8.30/2.74 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 8.30/2.74 # Initial clauses : 748
% 8.30/2.74 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 8.30/2.74 # Initial clauses in saturation : 748
% 8.30/2.74 # Processed clauses : 754
% 8.30/2.74 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 8.30/2.74 # ...subsumed : 0
% 8.30/2.74 # ...remaining for further processing : 754
% 8.30/2.74 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 8.30/2.74 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 8.30/2.74 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 8.30/2.74 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 8.30/2.74 # Generated clauses : 1695
% 8.30/2.74 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1694
% 8.30/2.74 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 8.30/2.74 # Paramodulations : 1695
% 8.30/2.74 # Factorizations : 0
% 8.30/2.74 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 8.30/2.74 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 8.30/2.74 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 8.30/2.74 # Current number of processed clauses : 754
% 8.30/2.74 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 441
% 8.30/2.74 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.30/2.74 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 8.30/2.74 # Non-unit-clauses : 313
% 8.30/2.74 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1688
% 8.30/2.74 # ...number of literals in the above : 5569
% 8.30/2.74 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 8.30/2.74 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 8.30/2.74 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 25211
% 8.30/2.74 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9544
% 8.30/2.74 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 8.30/2.74 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 889
% 8.30/2.74 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 8.30/2.74 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 8.30/2.74 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 8.30/2.74 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 8.30/2.74 # Condensation successes : 0
% 8.30/2.74 # Termbank termtop insertions : 33236
% 8.30/2.74
% 8.30/2.74 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.30/2.74 # User time : 0.056 s
% 8.30/2.74 # System time : 0.008 s
% 8.30/2.74 # Total time : 0.064 s
% 8.30/2.74 # ...preprocessing : 0.026 s
% 8.30/2.74 # ...main loop : 0.038 s
% 8.30/2.74 # Maximum resident set size: 9580 pages
% 8.30/2.74
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------