TSTP Solution File: CSR114+26 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR114+26 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 5.86s 2.81s
% Output : CNFRefutation 5.86s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 27 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 27 RR)
% Number of literals : 66 ( 0 equ; 45 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_766,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(X3,X1)
| ~ scar(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X2,X5)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3uev1b_6/input.p',i_0_766) ).
cnf(i_0_260,hypothesis,
val(c89,rom_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3uev1b_6/input.p',i_0_260) ).
cnf(i_0_261,hypothesis,
sub(c89,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3uev1b_6/input.p',i_0_261) ).
cnf(i_0_634,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3uev1b_6/input.p',i_0_634) ).
cnf(i_0_633,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3uev1b_6/input.p',i_0_633) ).
cnf(i_0_635,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3uev1b_6/input.p',i_0_635) ).
cnf(i_0_265,hypothesis,
loc(c82,c91),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3uev1b_6/input.p',i_0_265) ).
cnf(i_0_264,hypothesis,
sub(c82,kolosseum_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3uev1b_6/input.p',i_0_264) ).
cnf(i_0_259,hypothesis,
in(c91,c88),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3uev1b_6/input.p',i_0_259) ).
cnf(i_0_263,hypothesis,
attr(c88,c89),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3uev1b_6/input.p',i_0_263) ).
cnf(i_0_262,hypothesis,
sub(c88,stadt__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3uev1b_6/input.p',i_0_262) ).
cnf(c_0_778,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(X3,X1)
| ~ scar(X3,X4)
| ~ attr(X2,X5)
| ~ subs(X3,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X2,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
i_0_766 ).
cnf(c_0_779,hypothesis,
val(c89,rom_0),
i_0_260 ).
cnf(c_0_780,hypothesis,
sub(c89,name_1_1),
i_0_261 ).
cnf(c_0_781,negated_conjecture,
( ~ attr(X1,c89)
| ~ scar(X2,X3)
| ~ sub(X3,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ loc(X2,X4)
| ~ subs(X2,stehen_1_1)
| ~ in(X4,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_778,c_0_779]),c_0_780])]) ).
cnf(c_0_782,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_634 ).
cnf(c_0_783,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_633 ).
cnf(c_0_784,plain,
( ~ attr(X1,c89)
| ~ sub(X2,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ loc(esk27_2(X2,X3),X4)
| ~ loc(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X4,X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_781,c_0_782]),c_0_783]) ).
cnf(c_0_785,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_635 ).
cnf(c_0_786,plain,
( ~ attr(X1,c89)
| ~ sub(X2,kolosseum_1_1)
| ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ loc(X2,X3)
| ~ in(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_784,c_0_785]) ).
cnf(c_0_787,hypothesis,
loc(c82,c91),
i_0_265 ).
cnf(c_0_788,hypothesis,
sub(c82,kolosseum_1_1),
i_0_264 ).
cnf(c_0_789,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c89)
| ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ in(c91,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_786,c_0_787]),c_0_788])]) ).
cnf(c_0_790,hypothesis,
in(c91,c88),
i_0_259 ).
cnf(c_0_791,hypothesis,
attr(c88,c89),
i_0_263 ).
cnf(c_0_792,hypothesis,
sub(c88,stadt__1_1),
i_0_262 ).
cnf(c_0_793,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_789,c_0_790]),c_0_791]),c_0_792])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : CSR114+26 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 09:54:06 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.44/0.63 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.44/0.63 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.44/0.63 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.44/0.63 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 5.86/2.81 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 5.86/2.81 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 5.86/2.81 # Preprocessing time : 0.022 s
% 5.86/2.81
% 5.86/2.81 # Proof found!
% 5.86/2.81 # SZS status Theorem
% 5.86/2.81 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.86/2.81 # Proof object total steps : 27
% 5.86/2.81 # Proof object clause steps : 16
% 5.86/2.81 # Proof object formula steps : 11
% 5.86/2.81 # Proof object conjectures : 3
% 5.86/2.81 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 5.86/2.81 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 5.86/2.81 # Proof object initial clauses used : 11
% 5.86/2.81 # Proof object initial formulas used : 11
% 5.86/2.81 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 5.86/2.81 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 8
% 5.86/2.81 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 5.86/2.81 # Parsed axioms : 786
% 5.86/2.81 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 5.86/2.81 # Initial clauses : 786
% 5.86/2.81 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 5.86/2.81 # Initial clauses in saturation : 786
% 5.86/2.81 # Processed clauses : 802
% 5.86/2.81 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 5.86/2.81 # ...subsumed : 0
% 5.86/2.81 # ...remaining for further processing : 801
% 5.86/2.81 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 5.86/2.81 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 5.86/2.81 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 5.86/2.81 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 5.86/2.81 # Generated clauses : 1681
% 5.86/2.81 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1680
% 5.86/2.81 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 5.86/2.81 # Paramodulations : 1681
% 5.86/2.81 # Factorizations : 0
% 5.86/2.81 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 5.86/2.81 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 5.86/2.81 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 5.86/2.81 # Current number of processed clauses : 801
% 5.86/2.81 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 481
% 5.86/2.81 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 5.86/2.81 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 5.86/2.81 # Non-unit-clauses : 320
% 5.86/2.81 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1664
% 5.86/2.81 # ...number of literals in the above : 5264
% 5.86/2.81 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 5.86/2.81 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 5.86/2.81 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 26123
% 5.86/2.81 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8935
% 5.86/2.81 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 5.86/2.81 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2150
% 5.86/2.81 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 5.86/2.81 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 5.86/2.81 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 5.86/2.81 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 5.86/2.81 # Condensation successes : 0
% 5.86/2.81 # Termbank termtop insertions : 33131
% 5.86/2.81
% 5.86/2.81 # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.86/2.81 # User time : 0.050 s
% 5.86/2.81 # System time : 0.007 s
% 5.86/2.81 # Total time : 0.057 s
% 5.86/2.81 # ...preprocessing : 0.022 s
% 5.86/2.81 # ...main loop : 0.035 s
% 5.86/2.81 # Maximum resident set size: 9708 pages
% 5.86/2.81
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------