TSTP Solution File: CSR114+22 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR114+22 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:08 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.51s 2.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.51s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 30 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 30 RR)
% Number of literals : 62 ( 0 equ; 41 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 48 ( 16 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_748,negated_conjecture,
( ~ loc(X1,X2)
| ~ scar(X1,X3)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ss0ebvc9/lgb.p',i_0_748) ).
cnf(i_0_235,hypothesis,
val(c103,rom_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ss0ebvc9/lgb.p',i_0_235) ).
cnf(i_0_236,hypothesis,
sub(c103,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ss0ebvc9/lgb.p',i_0_236) ).
cnf(i_0_237,hypothesis,
sub(c102,stadt__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ss0ebvc9/lgb.p',i_0_237) ).
cnf(i_0_238,hypothesis,
attr(c102,c103),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ss0ebvc9/lgb.p',i_0_238) ).
cnf(i_0_615,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ss0ebvc9/lgb.p',i_0_615) ).
cnf(i_0_616,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ss0ebvc9/lgb.p',i_0_616) ).
cnf(i_0_617,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ss0ebvc9/lgb.p',i_0_617) ).
cnf(i_0_706,plain,
( loc(X1,esk50_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ prop(X1,X2)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ss0ebvc9/lgb.p',i_0_706) ).
cnf(i_0_510,plain,
state_adjective_state_binding(italienisch__1_1,italien_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ss0ebvc9/lgb.p',i_0_510) ).
cnf(i_0_230,hypothesis,
prop(c4,italienisch__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-ss0ebvc9/lgb.p',i_0_230) ).
cnf(c_0_760,negated_conjecture,
( ~ loc(X1,X2)
| ~ scar(X1,X3)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
i_0_748 ).
cnf(c_0_761,hypothesis,
val(c103,rom_0),
i_0_235 ).
cnf(c_0_762,hypothesis,
sub(c103,name_1_1),
i_0_236 ).
cnf(c_0_763,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ subs(X2,stehen_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,c103)
| ~ scar(X2,X3)
| ~ loc(X2,X4) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_760,c_0_761]),c_0_762])]) ).
cnf(c_0_764,hypothesis,
sub(c102,stadt__1_1),
i_0_237 ).
cnf(c_0_765,hypothesis,
attr(c102,c103),
i_0_238 ).
cnf(c_0_766,hypothesis,
( ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_763,c_0_764]),c_0_765])]) ).
cnf(c_0_767,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_615 ).
cnf(c_0_768,plain,
( ~ scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X4)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_766,c_0_767]) ).
cnf(c_0_769,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_616 ).
cnf(c_0_770,plain,
( ~ loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_768,c_0_769]) ).
cnf(c_0_771,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_617 ).
cnf(c_0_772,plain,
~ loc(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_770,c_0_771]) ).
cnf(c_0_773,plain,
( loc(X1,esk50_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ prop(X1,X2)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3) ),
i_0_706 ).
cnf(c_0_774,plain,
( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X1,X2)
| ~ prop(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_772,c_0_773]) ).
cnf(c_0_775,plain,
state_adjective_state_binding(italienisch__1_1,italien_0),
i_0_510 ).
cnf(c_0_776,hypothesis,
prop(c4,italienisch__1_1),
i_0_230 ).
cnf(c_0_777,plain,
~ prop(X1,italienisch__1_1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_774,c_0_775]) ).
cnf(c_0_778,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_776,c_0_777]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : CSR114+22 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 07:27:06 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.41/0.60 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.41/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.41/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.41/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.51/2.63 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 7.51/2.63 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.51/2.63 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.51/2.63 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.51/2.63 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.51/2.63 #
% 7.51/2.63 # Preprocessing time : 0.029 s
% 7.51/2.63 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.51/2.63
% 7.51/2.63 # Proof found!
% 7.51/2.63 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.51/2.63 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.51/2.63 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.51/2.63
% 7.51/2.63 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.51/2.63 # User time : 0.051 s
% 7.51/2.63 # System time : 0.007 s
% 7.51/2.63 # Total time : 0.058 s
% 7.51/2.63 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 7.51/2.63
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------