TSTP Solution File: CSR114+14 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR114+14 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:06 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.70s 2.80s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.70s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 30 ( 15 unt; 0 nHn; 30 RR)
% Number of literals : 62 ( 0 equ; 41 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 8 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 9 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 48 ( 16 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_675,negated_conjecture,
( ~ loc(X1,X2)
| ~ scar(X1,X3)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bkahjokn/lgb.p',i_0_675) ).
cnf(i_0_183,hypothesis,
val(c639,rom_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bkahjokn/lgb.p',i_0_183) ).
cnf(i_0_184,hypothesis,
sub(c639,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bkahjokn/lgb.p',i_0_184) ).
cnf(i_0_185,hypothesis,
sub(c638,stadt__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bkahjokn/lgb.p',i_0_185) ).
cnf(i_0_186,hypothesis,
attr(c638,c639),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bkahjokn/lgb.p',i_0_186) ).
cnf(i_0_542,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bkahjokn/lgb.p',i_0_542) ).
cnf(i_0_543,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bkahjokn/lgb.p',i_0_543) ).
cnf(i_0_544,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bkahjokn/lgb.p',i_0_544) ).
cnf(i_0_633,plain,
( loc(X1,esk50_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ prop(X1,X2)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bkahjokn/lgb.p',i_0_633) ).
cnf(i_0_437,plain,
state_adjective_state_binding(italienisch__1_1,italien_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bkahjokn/lgb.p',i_0_437) ).
cnf(i_0_181,hypothesis,
prop(c643,italienisch__1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-bkahjokn/lgb.p',i_0_181) ).
cnf(c_0_687,negated_conjecture,
( ~ loc(X1,X2)
| ~ scar(X1,X3)
| ~ attr(X4,X5)
| ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ sub(X4,stadt__1_1)
| ~ val(X5,rom_0) ),
i_0_675 ).
cnf(c_0_688,hypothesis,
val(c639,rom_0),
i_0_183 ).
cnf(c_0_689,hypothesis,
sub(c639,name_1_1),
i_0_184 ).
cnf(c_0_690,hypothesis,
( ~ sub(X1,stadt__1_1)
| ~ subs(X2,stehen_1_1)
| ~ attr(X1,c639)
| ~ scar(X2,X3)
| ~ loc(X2,X4) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_687,c_0_688]),c_0_689])]) ).
cnf(c_0_691,hypothesis,
sub(c638,stadt__1_1),
i_0_185 ).
cnf(c_0_692,hypothesis,
attr(c638,c639),
i_0_186 ).
cnf(c_0_693,hypothesis,
( ~ subs(X1,stehen_1_1)
| ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_690,c_0_691]),c_0_692])]) ).
cnf(c_0_694,plain,
( subs(esk27_2(X1,X2),stehen_1_1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_542 ).
cnf(c_0_695,plain,
( ~ scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X4)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_693,c_0_694]) ).
cnf(c_0_696,plain,
( scar(esk27_2(X1,X2),X1)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_543 ).
cnf(c_0_697,plain,
( ~ loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X3)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_695,c_0_696]) ).
cnf(c_0_698,plain,
( loc(esk27_2(X1,X2),X2)
| ~ loc(X1,X2) ),
i_0_544 ).
cnf(c_0_699,plain,
~ loc(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_697,c_0_698]) ).
cnf(c_0_700,plain,
( loc(X1,esk50_3(X1,X2,X3))
| ~ prop(X1,X2)
| ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X2,X3) ),
i_0_633 ).
cnf(c_0_701,plain,
( ~ state_adjective_state_binding(X1,X2)
| ~ prop(X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_699,c_0_700]) ).
cnf(c_0_702,plain,
state_adjective_state_binding(italienisch__1_1,italien_0),
i_0_437 ).
cnf(c_0_703,hypothesis,
prop(c643,italienisch__1_1),
i_0_181 ).
cnf(c_0_704,plain,
~ prop(X1,italienisch__1_1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_701,c_0_702]) ).
cnf(c_0_705,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_703,c_0_704]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : CSR114+14 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 03:22:21 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.39/0.61 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.39/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.39/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.70/2.80 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.70/2.80 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.70/2.80 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.70/2.80 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 8.70/2.80 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 8.70/2.80 #
% 8.70/2.80 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 8.70/2.80 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.70/2.80
% 8.70/2.80 # Proof found!
% 8.70/2.80 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.70/2.80 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.70/2.80 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.70/2.80
% 8.70/2.80 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.70/2.80 # User time : 0.045 s
% 8.70/2.80 # System time : 0.012 s
% 8.70/2.80 # Total time : 0.057 s
% 8.70/2.80 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 8.70/2.80
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------