TSTP Solution File: CSR113+6 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR113+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:05 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 5.03s 2.69s
% Output : CNFRefutation 5.03s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 7 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 14 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1042,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ flp(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X5,new_york_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-43c4uflq/input.p',i_0_1042) ).
cnf(i_0_523,hypothesis,
val(c24785,new_york_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-43c4uflq/input.p',i_0_523) ).
cnf(i_0_524,hypothesis,
sub(c24785,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-43c4uflq/input.p',i_0_524) ).
cnf(i_0_505,hypothesis,
flp(c25868,c25819),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-43c4uflq/input.p',i_0_505) ).
cnf(i_0_517,hypothesis,
scar(c24791,c24784),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-43c4uflq/input.p',i_0_517) ).
cnf(c_0_1048,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ flp(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X5,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X5,new_york_0) ),
i_0_1042 ).
cnf(c_0_1049,hypothesis,
val(c24785,new_york_0),
i_0_523 ).
cnf(c_0_1050,hypothesis,
sub(c24785,name_1_1),
i_0_524 ).
cnf(c_0_1051,negated_conjecture,
( ~ flp(X1,X2)
| ~ scar(X3,X4) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1048,c_0_1049]),c_0_1050])]) ).
cnf(c_0_1052,hypothesis,
flp(c25868,c25819),
i_0_505 ).
cnf(c_0_1053,hypothesis,
scar(c24791,c24784),
i_0_517 ).
cnf(c_0_1054,hypothesis,
~ scar(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1051,c_0_1052]) ).
cnf(c_0_1055,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_1053,c_0_1054]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : CSR113+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 19:37:38 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.37/0.60 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.37/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.37/0.60 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 5.03/2.69 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 5.03/2.69 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 5.03/2.69 # Preprocessing time : 0.032 s
% 5.03/2.69
% 5.03/2.69 # Proof found!
% 5.03/2.69 # SZS status Theorem
% 5.03/2.69 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.03/2.69 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 5.03/2.69 # Proof object clause steps : 8
% 5.03/2.69 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 5.03/2.69 # Proof object conjectures : 3
% 5.03/2.69 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 5.03/2.69 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 5.03/2.69 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 5.03/2.69 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 5.03/2.69 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 5.03/2.69 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 5.03/2.69 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 5.03/2.69 # Parsed axioms : 1062
% 5.03/2.69 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 5.03/2.69 # Initial clauses : 1062
% 5.03/2.69 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 5.03/2.69 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1062
% 5.03/2.69 # Processed clauses : 1066
% 5.03/2.69 # ...of these trivial : 2
% 5.03/2.69 # ...subsumed : 0
% 5.03/2.69 # ...remaining for further processing : 1064
% 5.03/2.69 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 5.03/2.69 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 5.03/2.69 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 5.03/2.69 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 5.03/2.69 # Generated clauses : 1893
% 5.03/2.69 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1878
% 5.03/2.69 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 5.03/2.69 # Paramodulations : 1892
% 5.03/2.69 # Factorizations : 0
% 5.03/2.69 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 5.03/2.69 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 5.03/2.69 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 5.03/2.69 # Current number of processed clauses : 1062
% 5.03/2.69 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 752
% 5.03/2.69 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 5.03/2.69 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 5.03/2.69 # Non-unit-clauses : 309
% 5.03/2.69 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1868
% 5.03/2.69 # ...number of literals in the above : 5596
% 5.03/2.69 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 5.03/2.69 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 5.03/2.69 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 28865
% 5.03/2.69 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9042
% 5.03/2.69 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 5.03/2.69 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3707
% 5.03/2.69 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 5.03/2.69 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 5.03/2.69 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 5.03/2.69 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 5.03/2.69 # Condensation successes : 0
% 5.03/2.69 # Termbank termtop insertions : 36477
% 5.03/2.69
% 5.03/2.69 # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.03/2.69 # User time : 0.069 s
% 5.03/2.69 # System time : 0.006 s
% 5.03/2.69 # Total time : 0.075 s
% 5.03/2.69 # ...preprocessing : 0.032 s
% 5.03/2.69 # ...main loop : 0.043 s
% 5.03/2.69 # Maximum resident set size: 11292 pages
% 5.03/2.69
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------