TSTP Solution File: CSR113+21 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR113+21 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:49:02 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 6.90s 2.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 6.90s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 17 RR)
% Number of literals : 43 ( 0 equ; 30 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 40 ( 19 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_696,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X4,new_york_0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-h0_kkfd8/lgb.p',i_0_696) ).
cnf(i_0_202,hypothesis,
val(c28074,new_york_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-h0_kkfd8/lgb.p',i_0_202) ).
cnf(i_0_203,hypothesis,
sub(c28074,name_1_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-h0_kkfd8/lgb.p',i_0_203) ).
cnf(i_0_205,hypothesis,
attr(c28073,c28074),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-h0_kkfd8/lgb.p',i_0_205) ).
cnf(i_0_33,plain,
( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-h0_kkfd8/lgb.p',i_0_33) ).
cnf(i_0_567,plain,
( member(X1,cons(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-h0_kkfd8/lgb.p',i_0_567) ).
cnf(i_0_566,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-h0_kkfd8/lgb.p',i_0_566) ).
cnf(c_0_704,negated_conjecture,
( ~ scar(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X4)
| ~ sub(X4,name_1_1)
| ~ val(X4,new_york_0) ),
i_0_696 ).
cnf(c_0_705,hypothesis,
val(c28074,new_york_0),
i_0_202 ).
cnf(c_0_706,hypothesis,
sub(c28074,name_1_1),
i_0_203 ).
cnf(c_0_707,hypothesis,
( ~ attr(X1,c28074)
| ~ scar(X2,X3) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_704,c_0_705]),c_0_706])]) ).
cnf(c_0_708,hypothesis,
attr(c28073,c28074),
i_0_205 ).
cnf(c_0_709,plain,
( scar(esk6_3(X1,X2,X3),X3)
| ~ sub(X1,X2)
| ~ attr(X3,X1)
| ~ member(X2,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))) ),
i_0_33 ).
cnf(c_0_710,hypothesis,
~ scar(X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_707,c_0_708]) ).
cnf(c_0_711,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(eigenname_1_1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil))))
| ~ sub(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_709,c_0_710]) ).
cnf(c_0_712,plain,
( member(X1,cons(X2,X3))
| ~ member(X1,X3) ),
i_0_567 ).
cnf(c_0_713,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(familiename_1_1,cons(name_1_1,nil)))
| ~ sub(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_711,c_0_712]) ).
cnf(c_0_714,plain,
( ~ member(X1,cons(name_1_1,nil))
| ~ sub(X2,X1)
| ~ attr(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_713,c_0_712]) ).
cnf(c_0_715,plain,
member(X1,cons(X1,X2)),
i_0_566 ).
cnf(c_0_716,plain,
( ~ sub(X1,name_1_1)
| ~ attr(X2,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_714,c_0_715]) ).
cnf(c_0_717,hypothesis,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_716,c_0_708]),c_0_706])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR113+21 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 08:46:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.40/0.59 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.40/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.40/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.40/0.59 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 6.90/2.56 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 6.90/2.56 # No SInE strategy applied
% 6.90/2.56 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 6.90/2.56 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 6.90/2.56 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 6.90/2.56 #
% 6.90/2.56 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 6.90/2.56 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 6.90/2.56
% 6.90/2.56 # Proof found!
% 6.90/2.56 # SZS status Theorem
% 6.90/2.56 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 6.90/2.56 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 6.90/2.56
% 6.90/2.56 # -------------------------------------------------
% 6.90/2.56 # User time : 0.051 s
% 6.90/2.56 # System time : 0.005 s
% 6.90/2.56 # Total time : 0.056 s
% 6.90/2.56 # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 6.90/2.56
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------