TSTP Solution File: CSR109+3 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : CSR109+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:41 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 147.76s 147.97s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : CSR109+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 19 00:16:32 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 10.60/10.39 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 10.60/10.39 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 10.60/10.39 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 21.53/21.23 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 21.53/21.23 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 21.53/21.23 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 32.07/32.23 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 32.07/32.23 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 32.07/32.23 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 43.03/43.08 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 43.03/43.08 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 43.03/43.08 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 47.40/48.10 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 47.40/48.10 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 47.40/48.10 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 58.37/58.67 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 58.37/58.67 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 58.37/58.67 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 69.35/70.03 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 69.35/70.03 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 69.35/70.03 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 80.34/81.57 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 80.34/81.57 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 80.34/81.57 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 94.46/95.97 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 94.46/95.97 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 94.46/95.97 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 147.65/147.89 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 147.65/147.89 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 147.65/147.89 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 147.76/147.97 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------