TSTP Solution File: CSR107+3 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : CSR107+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:40 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 151.77s 149.52s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR107+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu May 18 23:44:36 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 11.33/11.15 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 11.33/11.15 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 11.33/11.15 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 22.23/22.17 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 22.23/22.17 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 22.23/22.17 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 32.89/33.35 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 32.89/33.35 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 32.89/33.35 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 43.63/43.88 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 43.63/43.88 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 43.63/43.88 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 47.50/48.56 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 47.50/48.56 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 47.50/48.56 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 58.50/59.67 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 58.50/59.67 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 58.50/59.67 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 69.67/71.15 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 69.67/71.15 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 69.67/71.15 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 80.50/82.27 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 80.50/82.27 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 80.50/82.27 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 94.28/96.50 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 94.28/96.50 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 94.28/96.50 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 151.70/149.25 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 151.70/149.25 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 151.70/149.25 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 151.77/149.52 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------