TSTP Solution File: CSR106+3 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : CSR106+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:40 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 153.50s 154.02s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR106+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 19 00:29:52 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 12.71/12.44 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 12.71/12.44 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 12.71/12.44 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 24.97/24.64 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 24.97/24.64 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 24.97/24.64 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 37.05/36.79 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 37.05/36.79 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 37.05/36.79 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 49.08/49.20 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 49.08/49.20 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 49.08/49.20 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 53.47/54.38 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 53.47/54.38 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 53.47/54.38 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 64.16/65.59 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 64.16/65.59 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 64.16/65.59 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 74.58/75.77 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 74.58/75.77 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 74.58/75.77 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 86.06/87.11 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 86.06/87.11 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 86.06/87.11 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 99.99/100.98 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 99.99/100.98 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 99.99/100.98 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 153.47/153.13 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 153.47/153.13 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 153.47/153.13 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 153.50/154.02 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------