TSTP Solution File: CSR105+7 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : CSR105+7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:39 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 141.12s 141.72s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : CSR105+7 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.12/0.14 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 18 23:39:54 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 10.85/10.63 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 10.85/10.63 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 10.85/10.63 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 21.37/20.87 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 21.37/20.87 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 21.37/20.87 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 31.35/30.69 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 31.35/30.69 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 31.35/30.69 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 41.38/41.15 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 41.38/41.15 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 41.38/41.15 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 45.00/45.37 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 45.00/45.37 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 45.00/45.37 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 54.91/55.54 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 54.91/55.54 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 54.91/55.54 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 64.69/65.90 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 64.69/65.90 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 64.69/65.90 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 75.96/77.71 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 75.96/77.71 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 75.96/77.71 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 88.88/90.73 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 88.88/90.73 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 88.88/90.73 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 141.03/140.68 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 141.03/140.68 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 141.03/140.68 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 141.12/141.72 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------