TSTP Solution File: CSR103+6 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : CSR103+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 26.83s 28.01s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 26.83s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    8 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    8 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   1 sgn   4   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
    ! [X2341] : s__instance(X2341,s__Entity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_27371,axiom,
    ! [X857] : s__instance(X857,s__Entity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+2.ax',kb_SUMO_27371) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X2341] : s__instance(X2341,s__Entity),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL]) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(esk1_0,s__Entity),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X858] : s__instance(X858,s__Entity),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_27371]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(esk1_0,s__Entity),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    s__instance(X1,s__Entity),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem  : CSR103+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 14:31:19 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 26.83/28.01  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_2d86bd69119e7e9cc4417c0ee581499eaf828bb2 for 23 seconds:
% 26.83/28.01  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 26.83/28.01  # Preprocessing time       : 0.975 s
% 26.83/28.01  
% 26.83/28.01  # Proof found!
% 26.83/28.01  # SZS status Theorem
% 26.83/28.01  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 26.83/28.01  # Proof object total steps             : 8
% 26.83/28.01  # Proof object clause steps            : 3
% 26.83/28.01  # Proof object formula steps           : 5
% 26.83/28.01  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 26.83/28.01  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 26.83/28.01  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 26.83/28.01  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 2
% 26.83/28.01  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 2
% 26.83/28.01  # Proof object generating inferences   : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 26.83/28.01  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 26.83/28.01  # Parsed axioms                        : 55587
% 26.83/28.01  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 55572
% 26.83/28.01  # Initial clauses                      : 19
% 26.83/28.01  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 4
% 26.83/28.01  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 15
% 26.83/28.01  # Processed clauses                    : 7
% 26.83/28.01  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # ...remaining for further processing  : 7
% 26.83/28.01  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 26.83/28.01  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # Current number of processed clauses  : 5
% 26.83/28.01  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 26.83/28.01  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 26.83/28.01  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 26.83/28.01  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8
% 26.83/28.01  # ...number of literals in the above   : 28
% 26.83/28.01  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 26.83/28.01  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 26.83/28.01  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 26.83/28.01  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 26.83/28.01  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 648993
% 26.83/28.01  
% 26.83/28.01  # -------------------------------------------------
% 26.83/28.01  # User time                : 0.892 s
% 26.83/28.01  # System time              : 0.083 s
% 26.83/28.01  # Total time               : 0.975 s
% 26.83/28.01  # Maximum resident set size: 140900 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------