TSTP Solution File: CSR100+3 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR100+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 11.95s 4.86s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 11.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (   9 unt;   0 nHn;  18 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   34 (   0 equ;  18 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_672,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qdgze0_e/lgb.p',i_0_672) ).

cnf(i_0_670,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qdgze0_e/lgb.p',i_0_670) ).

cnf(i_0_671,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qdgze0_e/lgb.p',i_0_671) ).

cnf(i_0_3278,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Class31_2,s__Class31_3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qdgze0_e/lgb.p',i_0_3278) ).

cnf(i_0_3279,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Class31_3,s__Class31_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qdgze0_e/lgb.p',i_0_3279) ).

cnf(i_0_3280,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qdgze0_e/lgb.p',i_0_3280) ).

cnf(i_0_3270,plain,
    s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qdgze0_e/lgb.p',i_0_3270) ).

cnf(c_0_3288,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
    i_0_672 ).

cnf(c_0_3289,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_670 ).

cnf(c_0_3290,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_671 ).

cnf(c_0_3291,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3288,c_0_3289]),c_0_3290]) ).

cnf(c_0_3292,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Class31_2,s__Class31_3),
    i_0_3278 ).

cnf(c_0_3293,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Class31_3,s__Class31_1),
    i_0_3279 ).

cnf(c_0_3294,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__Class31_3)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__Class31_2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3291,c_0_3292]) ).

cnf(c_0_3295,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__Class31_1)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__Class31_3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3291,c_0_3293]) ).

cnf(c_0_3296,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_1),
    i_0_3280 ).

cnf(c_0_3297,plain,
    s__instance(s__Animal31,s__Class31_2),
    i_0_3270 ).

cnf(c_0_3298,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cdclpropres,[status(thm)],[c_0_3294,c_0_3295,c_0_3296,c_0_3297]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : CSR100+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 17:43:02 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 1.82/1.99  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.82/1.99  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 1.82/1.99  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 1.82/1.99  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 11.95/4.86  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 11.95/4.86  # SinE strategy is gf600_h_gu_R05_F100_L20000
% 11.95/4.86  # Trying AutoSched0 for 149 seconds
% 11.95/4.86  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 11.95/4.86  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 11.95/4.86  #
% 11.95/4.86  # Preprocessing time       : 0.028 s
% 11.95/4.86  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 11.95/4.86  # SatCheck found unsatisfiable ground set
% 11.95/4.86  
% 11.95/4.86  # Proof found!
% 11.95/4.86  # SZS status Theorem
% 11.95/4.86  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.95/4.86  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 11.95/4.86  
% 11.95/4.86  # -------------------------------------------------
% 11.95/4.86  # User time                : 0.251 s
% 11.95/4.86  # System time              : 0.029 s
% 11.95/4.86  # Total time               : 0.280 s
% 11.95/4.86  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 11.95/4.86  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------