TSTP Solution File: CSR099+4 by Vampire-SAT---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire-SAT---4.8
% Problem  : CSR099+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:45:00 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 6.77s 1.49s
% Output   : Refutation 6.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   52 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   54 (  22   ~;  19   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (  22   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f97705,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f19213,f18413,f19028,f27701]) ).

fof(f27701,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ s__subclass(X1,X0)
      | X0 = X1
      | ~ s__subclass(X0,X1) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f27700,f24780]) ).

fof(f24780,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ s__subclass(X0,X1)
      | s__instance(X0,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11998]) ).

fof(f11998,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X0,s__SetOrClass) )
      | ~ s__subclass(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8297]) ).

fof(f8297,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( s__subclass(X0,X1)
     => ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X0,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f26]) ).

fof(f26,axiom,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( s__subclass(X5,X6)
     => ( s__instance(X6,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X5,s__SetOrClass) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kb_SUMO_26) ).

fof(f27700,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
      | ~ s__subclass(X1,X0)
      | ~ s__subclass(X0,X1)
      | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f26075,f24780]) ).

fof(f26075,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
      | ~ s__subclass(X1,X0)
      | ~ s__subclass(X0,X1)
      | ~ s__instance(X0,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f13964]) ).

fof(f13964,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
      | ~ s__subclass(X1,X0)
      | ~ s__subclass(X0,X1)
      | ~ s__instance(X0,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f13963]) ).

fof(f13963,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X1
      | ~ s__subclass(X1,X0)
      | ~ s__subclass(X0,X1)
      | ~ s__instance(X0,s__SetOrClass)
      | ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f9283]) ).

fof(f9283,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( s__instance(X0,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__subclass(X1,X0)
          & s__subclass(X0,X1) )
       => X0 = X1 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f1217]) ).

fof(f1217,axiom,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
        & s__instance(X4,s__SetOrClass) )
     => ( ( s__subclass(X4,X3)
          & s__subclass(X3,X4) )
       => X3 = X4 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',kb_SUMO_1220) ).

fof(f19028,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Class30_1,s__Reptile),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7219]) ).

fof(f7219,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Class30_1,s__Reptile),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_2) ).

fof(f18413,plain,
    s__Reptile != s__Class30_1,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7224]) ).

fof(f7224,plain,
    s__Reptile != s__Class30_1,
    inference(flattening,[],[f7222]) ).

fof(f7222,negated_conjecture,
    s__Reptile != s__Class30_1,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f7221]) ).

fof(f7221,conjecture,
    s__Reptile = s__Class30_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO) ).

fof(f19213,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Class30_1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7220]) ).

fof(f7220,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Reptile,s__Class30_1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : CSR099+4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 02:20:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.36  % (31228)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.22/0.57  % (31235)ott+1_64_av=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=unused:gsp=on:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=2:nwc=1.1:sims=off:urr=on_497 on theBenchmark for (497ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.57  % (31231)WARNING: value z3 for option sas not known
% 0.22/0.57  % (31230)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbdsb=on:fmbes=contour:fmbswr=3:fde=none:nm=0_793 on theBenchmark for (793ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.58  % (31232)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=32_533 on theBenchmark for (533ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.58  % (31233)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency_531 on theBenchmark for (531ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.58  % (31234)ott-10_8_av=off:bd=preordered:bs=on:fsd=off:fsr=off:fde=unused:irw=on:lcm=predicate:lma=on:nm=4:nwc=1.7:sp=frequency_522 on theBenchmark for (522ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.58  % (31229)fmb+10_1_bce=on:fmbas=function:fmbsr=1.2:fde=unused:nm=0_846 on theBenchmark for (846ds/0Mi)
% 0.22/0.59  % (31231)dis+2_11_add=large:afr=on:amm=off:bd=off:bce=on:fsd=off:fde=none:gs=on:gsaa=full_model:gsem=off:irw=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=1.3:sas=z3:sims=off:sac=on:sp=reverse_arity_569 on theBenchmark for (569ds/0Mi)
% 3.55/1.07  Detected minimum model sizes of [51]
% 3.55/1.07  Detected maximum model sizes of [max]
% 3.55/1.07  Cannot represent all propositional literals internally
% 3.55/1.07  % (31232)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (31232)------------------------------
% 3.55/1.07  % (31232)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 3.55/1.07  % (31232)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 3.55/1.07  
% 3.55/1.07  % (31232)Memory used [KB]: 37021
% 3.55/1.07  % (31232)Time elapsed: 0.498 s
% 3.55/1.07  % (31232)Instructions burned: 1666 (million)
% 3.55/1.08  % (31232)------------------------------
% 3.55/1.08  % (31232)------------------------------
% 3.99/1.09  % (31236)fmb+10_1_fmbas=expand:fmbsr=1.1:gsp=on:nm=4_411 on theBenchmark for (411ds/0Mi)
% 6.61/1.48  % (31235)First to succeed.
% 6.61/1.48  % (31235)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-31228"
% 6.77/1.49  % (31235)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 6.77/1.49  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 6.77/1.49  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 6.77/1.49  % (31235)------------------------------
% 6.77/1.49  % (31235)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 6.77/1.49  % (31235)Termination reason: Refutation
% 6.77/1.49  
% 6.77/1.49  % (31235)Memory used [KB]: 45981
% 6.77/1.49  % (31235)Time elapsed: 0.916 s
% 6.77/1.49  % (31235)Instructions burned: 3173 (million)
% 6.77/1.49  % (31228)Success in time 1.121 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------