TSTP Solution File: CSR098+3 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : CSR098+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:18:30 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 5.10s 3.59s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    9 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_ALL,conjecture,
    s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_ALL) ).

fof(local_1,axiom,
    s__instance(s__Frog29_1,s__Amphibian),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).

fof(local_3,axiom,
    s__Frog29_1 = s__Animal29_1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',local_3) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_ALL])]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    s__instance(s__Frog29_1,s__Amphibian),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    s__Frog29_1 = s__Animal29_1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : CSR098+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 00:56:22 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.46  Running first-order model finding
% 0.19/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.10/3.59  # Version: 3.1.0
% 5.10/3.59  # Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 5.10/3.59  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 5.10/3.59  # Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1490s (5) cores
% 5.10/3.59  # Starting new_bool_3 with 298s (1) cores
% 5.10/3.59  # Starting new_bool_1 with 298s (1) cores
% 5.10/3.59  # Starting sh5l with 298s (1) cores
% 5.10/3.59  # new_bool_1 with pid 2793 completed with status 0
% 5.10/3.59  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 5.10/3.59  # Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 5.10/3.59  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 5.10/3.59  # Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1490s (5) cores
% 5.10/3.59  # Starting new_bool_3 with 298s (1) cores
% 5.10/3.59  # Starting new_bool_1 with 298s (1) cores
% 5.10/3.59  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 5.10/3.59  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 5.10/3.59  # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 298 seconds (298 total)
% 5.10/3.59  # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 5.10/3.59  # G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 2796 completed with status 0
% 5.10/3.59  # Result found by G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 5.10/3.59  # Preprocessing class: FLLLSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 5.10/3.59  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 298 seconds (2384 total)
% 5.10/3.59  # Starting G-E--_300_C01_S5PRR_S00 with 1490s (5) cores
% 5.10/3.59  # Starting new_bool_3 with 298s (1) cores
% 5.10/3.59  # Starting new_bool_1 with 298s (1) cores
% 5.10/3.59  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 5.10/3.59  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 5.10/3.59  # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 298 seconds (298 total)
% 5.10/3.59  # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 5.10/3.59  # Preprocessing time       : 0.030 s
% 5.10/3.59  
% 5.10/3.59  # Proof found!
% 5.10/3.59  # SZS status Theorem
% 5.10/3.59  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.10/3.59  # Parsed axioms                        : 145105
% 5.10/3.59  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 144400
% 5.10/3.59  # Initial clauses                      : 795
% 5.10/3.59  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 19
% 5.10/3.59  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 776
% 5.10/3.59  # Processed clauses                    : 33
% 5.10/3.59  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # ...remaining for further processing  : 32
% 5.10/3.59  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # NegExts                              : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 5.10/3.59  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 5.10/3.59  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 5.10/3.59  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 5.10/3.59  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 5.10/3.59  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 5.10/3.59  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 5.10/3.59  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 5.10/3.59  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 5.10/3.59  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 5.10/3.59  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 5.10/3.59  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 5.10/3.59  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 5.10/3.59  # Current number of processed clauses  : 32
% 5.10/3.59  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 23
% 5.10/3.59  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 5.10/3.59  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 5.10/3.59  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 8
% 5.10/3.59  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 743
% 5.10/3.59  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1432
% 5.10/3.59  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 18
% 5.10/3.59  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 5.10/3.59  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 5.10/3.59  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 5.10/3.59  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1033446
% 5.10/3.59  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 461663
% 5.10/3.59  
% 5.10/3.59  # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.10/3.59  # User time                : 0.361 s
% 5.10/3.59  # System time              : 0.125 s
% 5.10/3.59  # Total time               : 0.486 s
% 5.10/3.59  # Maximum resident set size: 172704 pages
% 5.10/3.59  
% 5.10/3.59  # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.10/3.59  # User time                : 2.785 s
% 5.10/3.59  # System time              : 0.220 s
% 5.10/3.59  # Total time               : 3.005 s
% 5.10/3.59  # Maximum resident set size: 98068 pages
% 5.10/3.59  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------