TSTP Solution File: CSR098+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR098+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:40 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.78s 2.97s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.78s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 9 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Frog29_1,s__Amphibian),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_1) ).
fof(local_3,axiom,
s__Frog29_1 = s__Animal29_1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_3) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
s__instance(s__Frog29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
s__Frog29_1 = s__Animal29_1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Animal29_1,s__Amphibian),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR098+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 10:58:20 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 1.78/2.97 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 1.78/2.97 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 1.78/2.97 # Preprocessing time : 0.220 s
% 1.78/2.97
% 1.78/2.97 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 1.78/2.97 # OLD status GaveUp
% 1.78/2.97 # Parsed axioms : 14791
% 1.78/2.97 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 14690
% 1.78/2.97 # Initial clauses : 106
% 1.78/2.97 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Initial clauses in saturation : 106
% 1.78/2.97 # Processed clauses : 179
% 1.78/2.97 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # ...subsumed : 36
% 1.78/2.97 # ...remaining for further processing : 143
% 1.78/2.97 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Generated clauses : 73
% 1.78/2.97 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 73
% 1.78/2.97 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 48
% 1.78/2.97 # Paramodulations : 73
% 1.78/2.97 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Current number of processed clauses : 143
% 1.78/2.97 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 94
% 1.78/2.97 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 1.78/2.97 # Non-unit-clauses : 48
% 1.78/2.97 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 1.78/2.97 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 797
% 1.78/2.97 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 112
% 1.78/2.97 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 84
% 1.78/2.97 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Termbank termtop insertions : 111935
% 1.78/2.97
% 1.78/2.97 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.78/2.97 # User time : 0.210 s
% 1.78/2.97 # System time : 0.015 s
% 1.78/2.97 # Total time : 0.225 s
% 1.78/2.97 # Maximum resident set size: 22468 pages
% 1.78/2.97 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 1.78/2.97 # Preprocessing time : 0.503 s
% 1.78/2.97
% 1.78/2.97 # Proof found!
% 1.78/2.97 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.78/2.97 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.78/2.97 # Proof object total steps : 9
% 1.78/2.97 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 1.78/2.97 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 1.78/2.97 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 1.78/2.97 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 1.78/2.97 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 1.78/2.97 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 1.78/2.97 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 1.78/2.97 # Proof object generating inferences : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 1.78/2.97 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.78/2.97 # Parsed axioms : 14791
% 1.78/2.97 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Initial clauses : 15982
% 1.78/2.97 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 63
% 1.78/2.97 # Initial clauses in saturation : 15919
% 1.78/2.97 # Processed clauses : 6
% 1.78/2.97 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # ...subsumed : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # ...remaining for further processing : 5
% 1.78/2.97 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Generated clauses : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Paramodulations : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Current number of processed clauses : 5
% 1.78/2.97 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 1.78/2.97 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 1.78/2.97 # Non-unit-clauses : 1
% 1.78/2.97 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15913
% 1.78/2.97 # ...number of literals in the above : 29074
% 1.78/2.97 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 1.78/2.97 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.78/2.97 # Termbank termtop insertions : 609766
% 1.78/2.97
% 1.78/2.97 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.78/2.97 # User time : 0.489 s
% 1.78/2.97 # System time : 0.018 s
% 1.78/2.97 # Total time : 0.507 s
% 1.78/2.97 # Maximum resident set size: 47732 pages
% 1.78/25.37 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.78/25.38 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.78/25.38 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.78/25.39 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.78/25.39 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.78/25.39 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.78/25.39 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.78/25.40 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.78/25.40 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.78/25.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.78/25.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.78/25.41 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.78/25.41 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.78/25.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.78/25.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.78/25.42 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.78/25.42 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.78/25.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.78/25.43 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------