TSTP Solution File: CSR097+3 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : CSR097+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:33 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 148.66s 149.67s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR097+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri May 19 01:03:20 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 10.98/10.79 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 10.98/10.79 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 10.98/10.79 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 22.60/22.95 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 22.60/22.95 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 22.60/22.95 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 33.41/33.55 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 33.41/33.55 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 33.41/33.55 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 44.37/44.93 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 44.37/44.93 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 44.37/44.93 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 48.34/49.84 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 48.34/49.84 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 48.34/49.84 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 59.47/60.74 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 59.47/60.74 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 59.47/60.74 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 70.53/72.08 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 70.53/72.08 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 70.53/72.08 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 81.64/83.52 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 81.64/83.52 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 81.64/83.52 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 95.44/97.58 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 95.44/97.58 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 95.44/97.58 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 148.61/148.76 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 148.61/148.76 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 148.61/148.76 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 148.66/149.67 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------