TSTP Solution File: CSR090+5 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR090+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:44 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 13.29s 4.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 13.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  16 unt;   0 nHn;  29 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   61 (   0 equ;  37 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1147,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimePosition) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xtpvnrza/lgb.p',i_0_1147) ).

cnf(i_0_3642,plain,
    s__temporalPart(s__Time17_2,s__Time17_3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xtpvnrza/lgb.p',i_0_3642) ).

cnf(i_0_1781,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xtpvnrza/lgb.p',i_0_1781) ).

cnf(i_0_1722,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xtpvnrza/lgb.p',i_0_1722) ).

cnf(i_0_1723,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xtpvnrza/lgb.p',i_0_1723) ).

cnf(i_0_3641,plain,
    s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xtpvnrza/lgb.p',i_0_3641) ).

cnf(i_0_3643,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xtpvnrza/lgb.p',i_0_3643) ).

cnf(i_0_9,plain,
    s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xtpvnrza/lgb.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(i_0_3639,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_2,s__TimeInterval),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xtpvnrza/lgb.p',i_0_3639) ).

cnf(i_0_3640,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_3,s__TimeInterval),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xtpvnrza/lgb.p',i_0_3640) ).

cnf(i_0_3638,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_1,s__TimeInterval),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-xtpvnrza/lgb.p',i_0_3638) ).

cnf(c_0_3655,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__TimePosition) ),
    i_0_1147 ).

cnf(c_0_3656,plain,
    s__temporalPart(s__Time17_2,s__Time17_3),
    i_0_3642 ).

cnf(c_0_3657,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
    i_0_1781 ).

cnf(c_0_3658,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_1722 ).

cnf(c_0_3659,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_1723 ).

cnf(c_0_3660,plain,
    ( s__temporalPart(X1,s__Time17_3)
    | ~ s__temporalPart(X1,s__Time17_2)
    | ~ s__instance(s__Time17_2,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(s__Time17_3,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3655,c_0_3656]) ).

cnf(c_0_3661,plain,
    s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_2),
    i_0_3641 ).

cnf(c_0_3662,negated_conjecture,
    ~ s__temporalPart(s__Time17_1,s__Time17_3),
    i_0_3643 ).

cnf(c_0_3663,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,X2)
    | ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_3657,c_0_3658]),c_0_3659]) ).

cnf(c_0_3664,plain,
    s__subclass(s__TimeInterval,s__TimePosition),
    i_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_3665,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(s__Time17_2,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(s__Time17_3,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(s__Time17_1,s__TimePosition) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3660,c_0_3661]),c_0_3662]) ).

cnf(c_0_3666,plain,
    ( s__instance(X1,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(X1,s__TimeInterval) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3663,c_0_3664]) ).

cnf(c_0_3667,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_2,s__TimeInterval),
    i_0_3639 ).

cnf(c_0_3668,plain,
    ( ~ s__instance(s__Time17_3,s__TimePosition)
    | ~ s__instance(s__Time17_1,s__TimePosition) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3665,c_0_3666]),c_0_3667])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3669,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_3,s__TimeInterval),
    i_0_3640 ).

cnf(c_0_3670,plain,
    ~ s__instance(s__Time17_1,s__TimePosition),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3668,c_0_3666]),c_0_3669])]) ).

cnf(c_0_3671,plain,
    s__instance(s__Time17_1,s__TimeInterval),
    i_0_3638 ).

cnf(c_0_3672,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3670,c_0_3666]),c_0_3671])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem  : CSR090+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 07:32:45 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.43  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.53/0.74  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.53/0.74  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.53/0.74  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.53/0.74  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 13.29/4.44  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 13.29/4.44  # SinE strategy is gf600_h_gu_R05_F100_L20000
% 13.29/4.44  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 13.29/4.44  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_C18_F1_AE_Q4_CS_SP_CO_S0Y
% 13.29/4.44  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 13.29/4.44  #
% 13.29/4.44  # Preprocessing time       : 0.028 s
% 13.29/4.44  
% 13.29/4.44  # Proof found!
% 13.29/4.44  # SZS status Theorem
% 13.29/4.44  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 13.29/4.44  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 13.29/4.44  
% 13.29/4.44  # -------------------------------------------------
% 13.29/4.44  # User time                : 0.567 s
% 13.29/4.44  # System time              : 0.023 s
% 13.29/4.44  # Total time               : 0.590 s
% 13.29/4.44  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 13.29/4.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------