TSTP Solution File: CSR089+3 by nanoCoP---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem  : CSR089+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:28 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unknown 159.30s 158.24s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : CSR089+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Fri May 19 00:24:09 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 14.32/14.01  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 14.32/14.01  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 14.32/14.01  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 27.78/27.91  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 27.78/27.91  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 27.78/27.91  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 40.52/40.51  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 40.52/40.51  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 40.52/40.51  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 52.83/52.67  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 52.83/52.67  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 52.83/52.67  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 57.65/57.80  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 57.65/57.80  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 57.65/57.80  Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 70.19/70.52  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 70.19/70.52  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 70.19/70.52  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 80.69/81.03  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 80.69/81.03  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 80.69/81.03  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 91.11/91.28  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 91.11/91.28  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 91.11/91.28  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 105.83/105.76  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 105.83/105.76  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 105.83/105.76  Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 159.24/157.38  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 159.24/157.38  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 159.24/157.38  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 159.30/158.23  Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------