TSTP Solution File: CSR086+3 by nanoCoP---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem  : CSR086+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:27 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unknown 148.00s 147.77s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : CSR086+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri May 19 00:47:42 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 10.79/10.59  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 10.79/10.59  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 10.79/10.59  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 21.77/21.25  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 21.77/21.25  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 21.77/21.25  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 32.84/32.76  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 32.84/32.76  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 32.84/32.76  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 43.76/44.00  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 43.76/44.00  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 43.76/44.00  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 47.99/49.02  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 47.99/49.02  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 47.99/49.02  Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 58.78/59.46  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 58.78/59.46  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 58.78/59.46  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 69.81/70.02  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 69.81/70.02  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 69.81/70.02  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 80.78/81.43  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 80.78/81.43  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 80.78/81.43  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 94.74/95.75  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 94.74/95.75  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 94.74/95.75  Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 147.95/146.82  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 147.95/146.82  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 147.95/146.82  Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 148.00/147.77  Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------