TSTP Solution File: CSR084+3 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : CSR084+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:25 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 158.89s 160.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : CSR084+3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 19 01:04:07 EDT 2023
% 0.19/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 14.37/14.08 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 14.37/14.08 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 14.37/14.08 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 25.51/25.50 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 25.51/25.50 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 25.51/25.50 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 36.24/36.60 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 36.24/36.60 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 36.24/36.60 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 47.21/48.08 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 47.21/48.08 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 47.21/48.08 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 51.25/52.93 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 51.25/52.93 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 51.25/52.93 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 62.55/64.01 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 62.55/64.01 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 62.55/64.01 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 78.05/79.59 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 78.05/79.59 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 78.05/79.59 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 91.17/92.80 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 91.17/92.80 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 91.17/92.80 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 105.56/107.38 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 105.56/107.38 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 105.56/107.38 Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 158.85/159.21 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 158.85/159.21 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 158.85/159.21 Peak sizes were: global stack 128152 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 158.89/160.03 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------