%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : CSR083+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:16:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.80s 0.97s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.80s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   17 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   15 (   7   ~;   4   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   0 sgn   1   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
    ? [X1223] :
      ( s__subclass(X1223,s__Animal)
      & s__subclass(X1223,s__CognitiveAgent)
      & X1223 = s__Human ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_7281,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_7281) ).

fof(kb_SUMO_15950,axiom,
    s__subclass(s__Human,s__Animal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+4.ax',kb_SUMO_15950) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1223] :
        ( s__subclass(X1223,s__Animal)
        & s__subclass(X1223,s__CognitiveAgent)
        & X1223 = s__Human ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X1224] :
      ( ~ s__subclass(X1224,s__Animal)
      | ~ s__subclass(X1224,s__CognitiveAgent)
      | X1224 != s__Human ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ s__subclass(X1,s__Animal)
    | ~ s__subclass(X1,s__CognitiveAgent)
    | X1 != s__Human ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_7281]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    s__subclass(s__Human,s__Animal),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_15950]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]),c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : CSR083+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 18:39:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.80/0.97  # SinE strategy is gf200_h_gu_R03_F100_L20000
% 0.80/0.97  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic C07_19_nc_SAT001_MinMin_rr
% 0.80/0.97  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 0.80/0.97  #
% 0.80/0.97  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.80/0.97  
% 0.80/0.97  # Proof found!
% 0.80/0.97  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.80/0.97  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.80/0.97  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------