TSTP Solution File: CSR082+4 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR082+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 9.68s 3.67s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.68s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 40 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 40 RR)
% Number of literals : 90 ( 0 equ; 56 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 11 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 44 ( 9 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_169,plain,
( s__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lky6l8bc/lgb.p',i_0_169) ).
cnf(i_0_1042,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lky6l8bc/lgb.p',i_0_1042) ).
cnf(i_0_1041,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lky6l8bc/lgb.p',i_0_1041) ).
cnf(i_0_2719,plain,
s__subclass(s__Agent,s__Object),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lky6l8bc/lgb.p',i_0_2719) ).
cnf(i_0_1091,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lky6l8bc/lgb.p',i_0_1091) ).
cnf(i_0_2753,plain,
s__subclass(s__CognitiveAgent,s__SentientAgent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lky6l8bc/lgb.p',i_0_2753) ).
cnf(i_0_2892,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__capability(s__Reasoning,X1,s__Jane8_1)
| ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X2,s__Jane8_1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lky6l8bc/lgb.p',i_0_2892) ).
cnf(i_0_1892,plain,
( s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lky6l8bc/lgb.p',i_0_1892) ).
cnf(i_0_2736,plain,
s__subclass(s__SentientAgent,s__Agent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lky6l8bc/lgb.p',i_0_2736) ).
cnf(i_0_2165,plain,
( s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lky6l8bc/lgb.p',i_0_2165) ).
cnf(i_0_2296,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lky6l8bc/lgb.p',i_0_2296) ).
cnf(i_0_2891,plain,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Human),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-lky6l8bc/lgb.p',i_0_2891) ).
cnf(c_0_2905,plain,
( s__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
i_0_169 ).
cnf(c_0_2906,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X2) ),
i_0_1042 ).
cnf(c_0_2907,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,X1) ),
i_0_1041 ).
cnf(c_0_2908,plain,
( s__subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_2905,c_0_2906]),c_0_2907]),c_0_2906]) ).
cnf(c_0_2909,plain,
s__subclass(s__Agent,s__Object),
i_0_2719 ).
cnf(c_0_2910,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
i_0_1091 ).
cnf(c_0_2911,plain,
s__subclass(s__CognitiveAgent,s__SentientAgent),
i_0_2753 ).
cnf(c_0_2912,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__capability(s__Reasoning,X1,s__Jane8_1)
| ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X2,s__Jane8_1) ),
i_0_2892 ).
cnf(c_0_2913,plain,
( s__capability(s__Reasoning,s__agent__m,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent) ),
i_0_1892 ).
cnf(c_0_2914,plain,
( s__subclass(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,s__Agent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2908,c_0_2909]) ).
cnf(c_0_2915,plain,
s__subclass(s__SentientAgent,s__Agent),
i_0_2736 ).
cnf(c_0_2916,plain,
( s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__subclass(X3,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_2910,c_0_2907]),c_0_2906]) ).
cnf(c_0_2917,plain,
( s__subclass(X1,s__SentientAgent)
| ~ s__subclass(X1,s__CognitiveAgent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2908,c_0_2911]) ).
cnf(c_0_2918,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__capability(s__Perception,X1,s__Jane8_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2912,c_0_2913]) ).
cnf(c_0_2919,plain,
( s__capability(s__Perception,s__experiencer__m,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent) ),
i_0_2165 ).
cnf(c_0_2920,plain,
s__subclass(s__SentientAgent,s__Object),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2914,c_0_2915]) ).
cnf(c_0_2921,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent)
| ~ s__subclass(X2,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2916,c_0_2917]) ).
cnf(c_0_2922,plain,
s__subclass(s__Human,s__CognitiveAgent),
i_0_2296 ).
cnf(c_0_2923,plain,
( ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__SentientAgent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2918,c_0_2919]) ).
cnf(c_0_2924,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2916,c_0_2911]) ).
cnf(c_0_2925,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2916,c_0_2920]) ).
cnf(c_0_2926,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SentientAgent)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2921,c_0_2922]) ).
cnf(c_0_2927,plain,
( ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__CognitiveAgent) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2923,c_0_2924]) ).
cnf(c_0_2928,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2916,c_0_2922]) ).
cnf(c_0_2929,plain,
s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Human),
i_0_2891 ).
cnf(c_0_2930,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__Object)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__Human) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2925,c_0_2926]) ).
cnf(c_0_2931,plain,
~ s__instance(s__Jane8_1,s__Object),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2927,c_0_2928]),c_0_2929])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2932,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2930,c_0_2929]),c_0_2931]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR082+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 00:44:24 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.37/0.61 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.37/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.37/0.61 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 9.68/3.67 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 9.68/3.67 # No SInE strategy applied
% 9.68/3.67 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 9.68/3.67 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 9.68/3.67 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 9.68/3.67 #
% 9.68/3.67 # Preprocessing time : 0.028 s
% 9.68/3.67
% 9.68/3.67 # Proof found!
% 9.68/3.67 # SZS status Theorem
% 9.68/3.67 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.68/3.67 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.68/3.67
% 9.68/3.67 # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.68/3.67 # User time : 0.160 s
% 9.68/3.67 # System time : 0.011 s
% 9.68/3.67 # Total time : 0.171 s
% 9.68/3.67 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 9.68/3.67
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------