TSTP Solution File: CSR081+5 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR081+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 3.60s 128.78s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 17
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 31 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 107 ( 30 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 45 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 123 ( 47 ~; 53 |; 18 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 80 ( 50 sgn 18 !; 1 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_from_SUMO_MILO,conjecture,
( s__mother(s__Bill7_1,s__Jane7_1)
& s__mother(s__Bob7_1,s__Jane7_1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',prove_from_SUMO_MILO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_4682,axiom,
! [X171,X172,X173] :
( X172 = s__UnionFn(X173,X171)
<=> ! [X174,X175,X176] :
( ( s__instance(X173,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X172,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X171,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X174,X173)
& s__instance(X175,X171)
& s__instance(X176,X172) )
=> ( s__instance(X174,X172)
& s__instance(X175,X172)
& ( s__instance(X176,X173)
| s__instance(X176,X171) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_4682) ).
fof(local_4,axiom,
s__mother(s__Bill7_1,s__Jane7_1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_4) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_4719,axiom,
! [X168] :
( s__instance(X168,s__SetOrClass)
=> ( s__instance(X168,s__NullSet)
=> ~ ? [X48] : s__instance(X48,X168) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_4719) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( s__mother(s__Bill7_1,s__Jane7_1)
& s__mother(s__Bob7_1,s__Jane7_1) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO_MILO]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__mother(s__Bill7_1,s__Jane7_1)
| ~ s__mother(s__Bob7_1,s__Jane7_1) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X177,X178,X179,X180,X181,X182,X177,X178,X179] :
( ( s__instance(X180,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X180,X179)
| ~ s__instance(X181,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X182,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 != s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X181,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X180,X179)
| ~ s__instance(X181,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X182,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 != s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X182,X179)
| s__instance(X182,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X180,X179)
| ~ s__instance(X181,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X182,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 != s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(esk188_3(X177,X178,X179),X179)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(esk189_3(X177,X178,X179),X177)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(esk190_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( ~ s__instance(esk190_3(X177,X178,X179),X179)
| ~ s__instance(esk188_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| ~ s__instance(esk189_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( ~ s__instance(esk190_3(X177,X178,X179),X177)
| ~ s__instance(esk188_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| ~ s__instance(esk189_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_4682])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s__mother(s__Bob7_1,s__Jane7_1)
| ~ s__mother(s__Bill7_1,s__Jane7_1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
s__mother(s__Bill7_1,s__Jane7_1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,X3)
| s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ s__mother(s__Bob7_1,s__Jane7_1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( X1 = X2
| s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X169,X170] :
( ~ s__instance(X169,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X169,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X170,X169) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_4719])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__mother(X2,s__Jane7_1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X2,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,X3)
| s__instance(esk189_3(X3,X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X3,esk189_3(s__NullSet,X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,X3)
| s__instance(esk190_3(X3,X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( esk189_3(s__NullSet,X1,X2) = s__UnionFn(X3,X4)
| X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__NullSet) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( s__UnionFn(X1,X2) = s__UnionFn(X3,X4)
| X5 = s__UnionFn(X6,s__NullSet) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__NullSet)
| s__UnionFn(X3,X4) != X1 ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__UnionFn(X4,X5)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
s__UnionFn(X1,X2) = s__UnionFn(X3,s__NullSet),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__UnionFn(X3,X4))
| X5 = s__UnionFn(X6,s__NullSet) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
s__UnionFn(X1,X2) = s__UnionFn(X3,X4),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__UnionFn(X3,X4)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]),c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
X1 = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ s__mother(X1,s__Jane7_1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_29]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : CSR081+5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 23:41:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 2.99/26.04 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.99/26.05 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 2.99/26.07 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.00/26.65 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.13/49.09 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.13/49.10 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.13/49.43 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.13/49.66 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.28/72.12 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.28/72.13 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.28/72.46 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.28/72.69 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.42/95.18 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.42/95.19 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.42/95.70 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.42/95.85 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.55/118.24 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.56/119.33 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.56/120.67 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.58/123.47 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.60/128.78 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 3.60/128.78
% 3.60/128.78 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 3.60/128.78 # OLD status Res
% 3.60/128.78 # Preprocessing time : 0.713 s
% 3.60/128.78 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_773c90a94152ea2e8c9d3df9c4b1eb6152c40c03 for 23 seconds:
% 3.60/128.78
% 3.60/128.78 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 3.60/128.78 # OLD status Res
% 3.60/128.78 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,,100,1.0)
% 3.60/128.78 # Preprocessing time : 0.220 s
% 3.60/128.78 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_75515770aeb32f68e33e9fbd9dff93f5a2e34f2e for 23 seconds:
% 3.60/128.78
% 3.60/128.78 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 3.60/128.78 # OLD status Res
% 3.60/128.78 # Preprocessing time : 0.792 s
% 3.60/128.78 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_6c565d2524e660970ec2a72c26d577f665a55420 for 23 seconds:
% 3.60/128.78
% 3.60/128.78 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 3.60/128.78 # OLD status Res
% 3.60/128.78 # Preprocessing time : 0.920 s
% 3.60/128.78 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_750456fc664a9e0b97096ad0f5110b1ead7d782b for 23 seconds:
% 3.60/128.78
% 3.60/128.78 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 3.60/128.78 # OLD status Res
% 3.60/128.78 # Preprocessing time : 0.938 s
% 3.60/128.78 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_a9abcacdf80c460fdc9fe242616d68da2308faf5 for 23 seconds:
% 3.60/128.78 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 3.60/128.78 # Preprocessing time : 0.319 s
% 3.60/128.78
% 3.60/128.78 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 3.60/128.78 # OLD status GaveUp
% 3.60/128.78 # Parsed axioms : 16754
% 3.60/128.78 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 16717
% 3.60/128.78 # Initial clauses : 38
% 3.60/128.78 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Initial clauses in saturation : 38
% 3.60/128.78 # Processed clauses : 40
% 3.60/128.78 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # ...subsumed : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # ...remaining for further processing : 40
% 3.60/128.78 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 3.60/128.78 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Generated clauses : 2
% 3.60/128.78 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 2
% 3.60/128.78 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Paramodulations : 1
% 3.60/128.78 # Factorizations : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 3.60/128.78 # Current number of processed clauses : 39
% 3.60/128.78 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 3.60/128.78 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 3.60/128.78 # Non-unit-clauses : 27
% 3.60/128.78 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 3.60/128.78 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 59
% 3.60/128.78 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 3.60/128.78 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% 3.60/128.78 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 3.60/128.78 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Condensation successes : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Termbank termtop insertions : 166114
% 3.60/128.78
% 3.60/128.78 # -------------------------------------------------
% 3.60/128.78 # User time : 0.304 s
% 3.60/128.78 # System time : 0.016 s
% 3.60/128.78 # Total time : 0.320 s
% 3.60/128.78 # Maximum resident set size: 43256 pages
% 3.60/128.78 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e60008599937a0dc787316fd87bf9ff4d65ffb48 for 23 seconds:
% 3.60/128.78 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 3.60/128.78 # Preprocessing time : 0.255 s
% 3.60/128.78
% 3.60/128.78 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 3.60/128.78 # OLD status GaveUp
% 3.60/128.78 # Parsed axioms : 16754
% 3.60/128.78 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 16704
% 3.60/128.78 # Initial clauses : 51
% 3.60/128.78 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Initial clauses in saturation : 51
% 3.60/128.78 # Processed clauses : 127
% 3.60/128.78 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # ...subsumed : 24
% 3.60/128.78 # ...remaining for further processing : 103
% 3.60/128.78 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 3.60/128.78 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Backward-subsumed : 2
% 3.60/128.78 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Generated clauses : 119
% 3.60/128.78 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 76
% 3.60/128.78 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 82
% 3.60/128.78 # Paramodulations : 118
% 3.60/128.78 # Factorizations : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 3.60/128.78 # Current number of processed clauses : 100
% 3.60/128.78 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 3.60/128.78 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 3.60/128.78 # Non-unit-clauses : 86
% 3.60/128.78 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 3.60/128.78 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 3.60/128.78 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3582
% 3.60/128.78 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 641
% 3.60/128.78 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 108
% 3.60/128.78 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23
% 3.60/128.78 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 3.60/128.78 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Condensation successes : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Termbank termtop insertions : 171219
% 3.60/128.78
% 3.60/128.78 # -------------------------------------------------
% 3.60/128.78 # User time : 0.240 s
% 3.60/128.78 # System time : 0.023 s
% 3.60/128.78 # Total time : 0.263 s
% 3.60/128.78 # Maximum resident set size: 44440 pages
% 3.60/128.78 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_03d534503f753dd3be02bb3c547fa7a3e34e825e for 23 seconds:
% 3.60/128.78 # Preprocessing time : 0.769 s
% 3.60/128.78
% 3.60/128.78 # Proof found!
% 3.60/128.78 # SZS status Theorem
% 3.60/128.78 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.60/128.78 # Proof object total steps : 31
% 3.60/128.78 # Proof object clause steps : 23
% 3.60/128.78 # Proof object formula steps : 8
% 3.60/128.78 # Proof object conjectures : 8
% 3.60/128.78 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 3.60/128.78 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 3.60/128.78 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 3.60/128.78 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 3.60/128.78 # Proof object generating inferences : 14
% 3.60/128.78 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 3.60/128.78 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 3.60/128.78 # Parsed axioms : 16754
% 3.60/128.78 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Initial clauses : 20276
% 3.60/128.78 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 63
% 3.60/128.78 # Initial clauses in saturation : 20213
% 3.60/128.78 # Processed clauses : 20539
% 3.60/128.78 # ...of these trivial : 42
% 3.60/128.78 # ...subsumed : 351
% 3.60/128.78 # ...remaining for further processing : 20146
% 3.60/128.78 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1057
% 3.60/128.78 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 243346
% 3.60/128.78 # Backward-subsumed : 673
% 3.60/128.78 # Backward-rewritten : 3631
% 3.60/128.78 # Generated clauses : 461886
% 3.60/128.78 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 461099
% 3.60/128.78 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1720
% 3.60/128.78 # Paramodulations : 460458
% 3.60/128.78 # Factorizations : 17
% 3.60/128.78 # Equation resolutions : 1173
% 3.60/128.78 # Current number of processed clauses : 15593
% 3.60/128.78 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 9301
% 3.60/128.78 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 3.60/128.78 # Negative unit clauses : 31
% 3.60/128.78 # Non-unit-clauses : 6260
% 3.60/128.78 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 70086
% 3.60/128.78 # ...number of literals in the above : 121396
% 3.60/128.78 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Current number of archived clauses : 4542
% 3.60/128.78 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 21158318
% 3.60/128.78 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4148081
% 3.60/128.78 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2063
% 3.60/128.78 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1864076
% 3.60/128.78 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 30740
% 3.60/128.78 # BW rewrite match attempts : 34485
% 3.60/128.78 # BW rewrite match successes : 31907
% 3.60/128.78 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Condensation successes : 0
% 3.60/128.78 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6072118
% 3.60/128.78
% 3.60/128.78 # -------------------------------------------------
% 3.60/128.78 # User time : 9.216 s
% 3.60/128.78 # System time : 0.264 s
% 3.60/128.78 # Total time : 9.480 s
% 3.60/128.78 # Maximum resident set size: 313732 pages
% 3.60/142.39 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.60/142.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 3.60/142.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.60/142.43 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 3.60/142.43 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.60/144.21 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.60/144.23 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 3.60/144.23 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.60/144.24 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 3.60/144.24 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.60/144.24 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 3.60/144.24 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.60/144.24 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 3.60/144.24 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.60/146.50 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 3.60/146.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 3.60/146.54 eprover: No such file or directory
% 3.60/146.54 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 3.60/146.54 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------