TSTP Solution File: CSR079+6 by nanoCoP---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem  : CSR079+6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:04:22 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unknown 142.91s 144.55s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : CSR079+6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri May 19 00:01:19 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 9.45/9.36  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 9.45/9.36  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 9.45/9.36  Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 19.88/19.71  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 19.88/19.71  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 19.88/19.71  Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 29.85/29.51  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 29.85/29.51  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 29.85/29.51  Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 39.68/39.86  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 39.68/39.86  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 39.68/39.86  Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 42.97/43.95  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 42.97/43.95  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 42.97/43.95  Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 54.30/55.83  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 54.30/55.83  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 54.30/55.83  Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 65.73/67.32  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 65.73/67.32  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 65.73/67.32  Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 76.54/78.12  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 76.54/78.12  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 76.54/78.12  Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 89.66/91.71  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 89.66/91.71  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 89.66/91.71  Peak sizes were: global stack 128280 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 142.86/143.75  *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 142.86/143.75  You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 142.86/143.75  Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 142.91/144.55  Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------