TSTP Solution File: CSR077+4 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR077+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.05s 27.23s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.05s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 80 ( 30 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 38 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 99 ( 38 ~; 43 |; 13 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 17 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 7 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 3 sgn 10 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_3259,axiom,
! [X52,X53] :
( ( s__AbsoluteValueFn(X53) = X52
& s__instance(X53,s__RealNumber)
& s__instance(X52,s__RealNumber) )
<=> ( ( s__instance(X53,s__NonnegativeRealNumber)
& X53 = X52 )
| ( s__instance(X53,s__NegativeRealNumber)
& X52 = minus("0",X53) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_3259) ).
fof(prove_from_SUMO,conjecture,
~ s__instance(s__Number3_1,s__NegativeRealNumber),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',prove_from_SUMO) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_3424,axiom,
! [X12] :
( s__instance(X12,s__RealNumber)
=> ( s__instance(X12,s__NegativeRealNumber)
=> s__SignumFn(X12) = "-1" ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_3424) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__Number3_1,s__NonnegativeRealNumber),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',local_1) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_3422,axiom,
! [X12] :
( s__instance(X12,s__RealNumber)
=> ( s__instance(X12,s__NonnegativeRealNumber)
=> ( s__SignumFn(X12) = "1"
| s__SignumFn(X12) = "0" ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+0.ax',kb_SUMO_3422) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X54,X55,X54,X55] :
( ( s__instance(X55,s__NegativeRealNumber)
| s__instance(X55,s__NonnegativeRealNumber)
| s__AbsoluteValueFn(X55) != X54
| ~ s__instance(X55,s__RealNumber)
| ~ s__instance(X54,s__RealNumber) )
& ( X54 = minus("0",X55)
| s__instance(X55,s__NonnegativeRealNumber)
| s__AbsoluteValueFn(X55) != X54
| ~ s__instance(X55,s__RealNumber)
| ~ s__instance(X54,s__RealNumber) )
& ( s__instance(X55,s__NegativeRealNumber)
| X55 = X54
| s__AbsoluteValueFn(X55) != X54
| ~ s__instance(X55,s__RealNumber)
| ~ s__instance(X54,s__RealNumber) )
& ( X54 = minus("0",X55)
| X55 = X54
| s__AbsoluteValueFn(X55) != X54
| ~ s__instance(X55,s__RealNumber)
| ~ s__instance(X54,s__RealNumber) )
& ( s__AbsoluteValueFn(X55) = X54
| ~ s__instance(X55,s__NonnegativeRealNumber)
| X55 != X54 )
& ( s__instance(X55,s__RealNumber)
| ~ s__instance(X55,s__NonnegativeRealNumber)
| X55 != X54 )
& ( s__instance(X54,s__RealNumber)
| ~ s__instance(X55,s__NonnegativeRealNumber)
| X55 != X54 )
& ( s__AbsoluteValueFn(X55) = X54
| ~ s__instance(X55,s__NegativeRealNumber)
| X54 != minus("0",X55) )
& ( s__instance(X55,s__RealNumber)
| ~ s__instance(X55,s__NegativeRealNumber)
| X54 != minus("0",X55) )
& ( s__instance(X54,s__RealNumber)
| ~ s__instance(X55,s__NegativeRealNumber)
| X54 != minus("0",X55) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_3259])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__RealNumber)
| X1 != X2
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__NonnegativeRealNumber) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ s__instance(s__Number3_1,s__NegativeRealNumber),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_from_SUMO]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X13] :
( ~ s__instance(X13,s__RealNumber)
| ~ s__instance(X13,s__NegativeRealNumber)
| s__SignumFn(X13) = "-1" ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_3424])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__RealNumber)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__NonnegativeRealNumber) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
s__instance(s__Number3_1,s__NonnegativeRealNumber),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
s__instance(s__Number3_1,s__NegativeRealNumber),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X13] :
( ~ s__instance(X13,s__RealNumber)
| ~ s__instance(X13,s__NonnegativeRealNumber)
| s__SignumFn(X13) = "1"
| s__SignumFn(X13) = "0" ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_3422])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( s__SignumFn(X1) = "-1"
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__NegativeRealNumber)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__RealNumber) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
s__instance(s__Number3_1,s__RealNumber),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
s__instance(s__Number3_1,s__NegativeRealNumber),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( s__SignumFn(X1) = "0"
| s__SignumFn(X1) = "1"
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__NonnegativeRealNumber)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__RealNumber) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
s__SignumFn(s__Number3_1) = "-1",
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_14]),c_0_10])]),c_0_17]),c_0_17])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : CSR077+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 17:12:06 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 1.03/24.11 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.03/24.11 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.03/24.14 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.05/24.69 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.05/27.23 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 1.05/27.23
% 1.05/27.23 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.05/27.23 # OLD status Res
% 1.05/27.23 # Preprocessing time : 0.277 s
% 1.05/27.23 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f6eb5f7f05126ea361481ae651a4823314e3d740 for 23 seconds:
% 1.05/27.23 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 1.05/27.23 # Preprocessing time : 0.188 s
% 1.05/27.23
% 1.05/27.23 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 1.05/27.23 # OLD status GaveUp
% 1.05/27.23 # Parsed axioms : 7219
% 1.05/27.23 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7191
% 1.05/27.23 # Initial clauses : 34
% 1.05/27.23 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.05/27.23 # Initial clauses in saturation : 34
% 1.05/27.23 # Processed clauses : 73
% 1.05/27.23 # ...of these trivial : 3
% 1.05/27.23 # ...subsumed : 1
% 1.05/27.23 # ...remaining for further processing : 69
% 1.05/27.23 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.05/27.23 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.05/27.23 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 1.05/27.23 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.05/27.23 # Generated clauses : 74
% 1.05/27.23 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 40
% 1.05/27.23 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 7
% 1.05/27.23 # Paramodulations : 74
% 1.05/27.23 # Factorizations : 0
% 1.05/27.23 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.05/27.23 # Current number of processed clauses : 66
% 1.05/27.23 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 24
% 1.05/27.23 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.05/27.23 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 1.05/27.23 # Non-unit-clauses : 42
% 1.05/27.23 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 1.05/27.23 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 1.05/27.23 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.05/27.23 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 1.05/27.23 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 231
% 1.05/27.23 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 116
% 1.05/27.23 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 10
% 1.05/27.23 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 42
% 1.05/27.23 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.05/27.23 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 1.05/27.23 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 1.05/27.23 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.05/27.23 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.05/27.23 # Termbank termtop insertions : 79587
% 1.05/27.23
% 1.05/27.23 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.05/27.23 # User time : 0.181 s
% 1.05/27.23 # System time : 0.009 s
% 1.05/27.23 # Total time : 0.190 s
% 1.05/27.23 # Maximum resident set size: 18436 pages
% 1.05/27.23 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_a172c605141d0894bf6fdc293a5220c6c2a32117 for 23 seconds:
% 1.05/27.23 # Preprocessing time : 0.347 s
% 1.05/27.23
% 1.05/27.23 # Proof found!
% 1.05/27.23 # SZS status Theorem
% 1.05/27.23 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.05/27.23 # Proof object total steps : 19
% 1.05/27.23 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 1.05/27.23 # Proof object formula steps : 10
% 1.05/27.23 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 1.05/27.23 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 1.05/27.23 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 1.05/27.23 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 1.05/27.23 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 1.05/27.23 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 1.05/27.23 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 8
% 1.05/27.23 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.05/27.23 # Parsed axioms : 7219
% 1.05/27.23 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.05/27.23 # Initial clauses : 8410
% 1.05/27.23 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 63
% 1.05/27.23 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8347
% 1.05/27.23 # Processed clauses : 8382
% 1.05/27.23 # ...of these trivial : 36
% 1.05/27.23 # ...subsumed : 161
% 1.05/27.23 # ...remaining for further processing : 8184
% 1.05/27.23 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 222
% 1.05/27.23 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.05/27.23 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 1.05/27.23 # Backward-rewritten : 428
% 1.05/27.23 # Generated clauses : 99967
% 1.05/27.23 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 99777
% 1.05/27.23 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1070
% 1.05/27.23 # Paramodulations : 99683
% 1.05/27.23 # Factorizations : 2
% 1.05/27.23 # Equation resolutions : 282
% 1.05/27.23 # Current number of processed clauses : 7746
% 1.05/27.23 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4484
% 1.05/27.23 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.05/27.23 # Negative unit clauses : 3
% 1.05/27.23 # Non-unit-clauses : 3259
% 1.05/27.23 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 79157
% 1.05/27.23 # ...number of literals in the above : 291164
% 1.05/27.23 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.05/27.23 # Current number of archived clauses : 429
% 1.05/27.23 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2772203
% 1.05/27.23 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 469771
% 1.05/27.23 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1232
% 1.05/27.23 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1105454
% 1.05/27.23 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.05/27.23 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 1.05/27.23 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 1.05/27.23 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.05/27.23 # Condensation successes : 0
% 1.05/27.23 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1830716
% 1.05/27.23
% 1.05/27.23 # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.05/27.23 # User time : 2.306 s
% 1.05/27.23 # System time : 0.088 s
% 1.05/27.23 # Total time : 2.394 s
% 1.05/27.23 # Maximum resident set size: 142528 pages
% 1.05/47.12 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.05/47.14 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.05/47.14 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.05/47.14 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.05/47.14 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.05/47.15 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.05/47.15 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.05/47.15 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.05/47.15 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.05/47.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.05/47.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.05/47.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.05/47.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.05/47.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.05/47.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.05/47.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.05/47.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.05/47.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.05/47.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.05/47.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.05/47.17 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------