TSTP Solution File: CSR076+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR076+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:15 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.59s 130.74s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 21
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 48 ( 17 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 176 ( 41 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 45 ( 3 avg)
% Number of connectives : 197 ( 69 ~; 83 |; 34 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 24 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 18 ( 18 usr; 10 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 118 ( 61 sgn 35 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(kb_SUMO_4682,axiom,
! [X171,X172,X173] :
( X172 = s__UnionFn(X173,X171)
<=> ! [X174,X175,X176] :
( ( s__instance(X173,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X172,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X171,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ( ( s__instance(X174,X173)
& s__instance(X175,X171)
& s__instance(X176,X172) )
=> ( s__instance(X174,X172)
& s__instance(X175,X172)
& ( s__instance(X176,X173)
| s__instance(X176,X171) ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_4682) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_4719,axiom,
! [X168] :
( s__instance(X168,s__SetOrClass)
=> ( s__instance(X168,s__NullSet)
=> ~ ? [X48] : s__instance(X48,X168) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_4719) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_606,axiom,
! [X26] : s__instance(X26,s__Entity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_606) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_4675,axiom,
! [X169,X170] :
( ! [X49] :
( ( s__instance(X170,s__Set)
& s__instance(X169,s__Set) )
=> ( s__element(X49,X170)
<=> s__element(X49,X169) ) )
=> X170 = X169 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_4675) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_11982,axiom,
! [X908] :
( s__instance(X908,s__Agreement)
=> ? [X361,X360] :
( s__instance(X360,s__CognitiveAgent)
& s__instance(X361,s__CognitiveAgent)
& s__partyToAgreement(X361,X908)
& s__partyToAgreement(X360,X908)
& X361 != X360 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_11982) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_374,axiom,
! [X9,X10] :
( s__disjoint(X9,X10)
<=> ! [X48] :
( ( s__instance(X10,s__SetOrClass)
& s__instance(X9,s__SetOrClass) )
=> ~ ( s__instance(X48,X9)
& s__instance(X48,X10) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_374) ).
fof(kb_SUMO_13786,axiom,
s__disjoint(s__OpeningEyes,s__ClosingEyes),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR003+1.ax',kb_SUMO_13786) ).
fof(local_1,axiom,
s__instance(s__TheKB2_1,s__ComputerProgram),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',local_1) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X177,X178,X179,X180,X181,X182,X177,X178,X179] :
( ( s__instance(X180,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X180,X179)
| ~ s__instance(X181,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X182,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 != s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X181,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X180,X179)
| ~ s__instance(X181,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X182,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 != s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X182,X179)
| s__instance(X182,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X180,X179)
| ~ s__instance(X181,X177)
| ~ s__instance(X182,X178)
| ~ s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 != s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X179,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X178,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(X177,s__SetOrClass)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(esk188_3(X177,X178,X179),X179)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(esk189_3(X177,X178,X179),X177)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( s__instance(esk190_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( ~ s__instance(esk190_3(X177,X178,X179),X179)
| ~ s__instance(esk188_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| ~ s__instance(esk189_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) )
& ( ~ s__instance(esk190_3(X177,X178,X179),X177)
| ~ s__instance(esk188_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| ~ s__instance(esk189_3(X177,X178,X179),X178)
| X178 = s__UnionFn(X179,X177) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_4682])])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X169,X170] :
( ~ s__instance(X169,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X169,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X170,X169) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_4719])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,X3)
| s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X27] : s__instance(X27,s__Entity),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_606]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X171,X172] :
( ( s__instance(X172,s__Set)
| X172 = X171 )
& ( s__instance(X171,s__Set)
| X172 = X171 )
& ( ~ s__element(esk187_2(X171,X172),X172)
| ~ s__element(esk187_2(X171,X172),X171)
| X172 = X171 )
& ( s__element(esk187_2(X171,X172),X172)
| s__element(esk187_2(X171,X172),X171)
| X172 = X171 ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_4675])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( X1 = X2
| s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
s__instance(X1,s__Entity),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( X1 = X2
| s__instance(X2,s__Set) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X909] :
( ( s__instance(esk1016_1(X909),s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__instance(X909,s__Agreement) )
& ( s__instance(esk1015_1(X909),s__CognitiveAgent)
| ~ s__instance(X909,s__Agreement) )
& ( s__partyToAgreement(esk1015_1(X909),X909)
| ~ s__instance(X909,s__Agreement) )
& ( s__partyToAgreement(esk1016_1(X909),X909)
| ~ s__instance(X909,s__Agreement) )
& ( esk1015_1(X909) != esk1016_1(X909)
| ~ s__instance(X909,s__Agreement) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_11982])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X4,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( s__instance(s__Entity,s__Set)
| s__instance(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__Agreement)
| esk1015_1(X1) != esk1016_1(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( X1 = X2
| s__instance(s__Entity,s__Set) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
s__instance(s__Entity,s__Set),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_19]),c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass)
| s__instance(s__Entity,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
s__instance(s__Entity,s__SetOrClass),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
~ s__instance(s__Entity,s__NullSet),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_24]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
s__instance(X1,s__SetOrClass),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X2,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,X3)
| s__instance(esk189_3(X3,X1,X2),X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X3,esk189_3(s__NullSet,X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,X3)
| s__instance(esk190_3(X3,X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( esk189_3(s__NullSet,X1,X2) = s__UnionFn(X3,X4)
| X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__NullSet) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( s__UnionFn(X1,X2) = s__UnionFn(X3,X4)
| X5 = s__UnionFn(X6,s__NullSet) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__NullSet)
| s__UnionFn(X3,X4) != X1 ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__NullSet)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__UnionFn(X4,X5)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
s__UnionFn(X1,X2) = s__UnionFn(X3,s__NullSet),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).
fof(c_0_36,plain,
! [X49,X50,X51,X49,X50] :
( ( ~ s__disjoint(X49,X50)
| ~ s__instance(X50,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X49,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X51,X49)
| ~ s__instance(X51,X50) )
& ( s__instance(X50,s__SetOrClass)
| s__disjoint(X49,X50) )
& ( s__instance(X49,s__SetOrClass)
| s__disjoint(X49,X50) )
& ( s__instance(esk1_2(X49,X50),X49)
| s__disjoint(X49,X50) )
& ( s__instance(esk1_2(X49,X50),X50)
| s__disjoint(X49,X50) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_374])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__UnionFn(X3,X4))
| X5 = s__UnionFn(X6,s__NullSet) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
s__UnionFn(X1,X2) = s__UnionFn(X3,X4),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_35]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X1,X3)
| ~ s__instance(X3,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__instance(X2,s__SetOrClass)
| ~ s__disjoint(X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,plain,
X1 = s__UnionFn(X2,s__UnionFn(X3,X4)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]),c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( ~ s__disjoint(X1,X2)
| ~ s__instance(X3,X1)
| ~ s__instance(X3,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_26]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
s__disjoint(s__OpeningEyes,s__ClosingEyes),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[kb_SUMO_13786]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
s__instance(s__TheKB2_1,s__ComputerProgram),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[local_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
X1 = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( ~ s__instance(X1,s__OpeningEyes)
| ~ s__instance(X1,s__ClosingEyes) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
s__instance(s__TheKB2_1,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]),c_0_46])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR076+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.14/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 12:43:13 EDT 2022
% 0.22/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 7.01/30.05 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 7.01/30.05 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 7.01/30.55 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 7.05/38.51 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 7.15/53.57 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 7.15/53.58 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 7.15/53.60 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 7.19/62.10 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 7.28/76.62 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 7.28/76.65 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 7.28/77.03 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 7.36/91.07 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 7.41/99.68 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 7.41/100.05 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 7.43/101.67 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 7.49/114.10 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 7.59/130.74 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 7.59/130.74
% 7.59/130.74 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 7.59/130.74 # OLD status Res
% 7.59/130.74 # Preprocessing time : 1.429 s
% 7.59/130.74 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_773c90a94152ea2e8c9d3df9c4b1eb6152c40c03 for 23 seconds:
% 7.59/130.74 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,,100,1.0)
% 7.59/130.74 # Preprocessing time : 0.473 s
% 7.59/130.74
% 7.59/130.74 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 7.59/130.74 # OLD status GaveUp
% 7.59/130.74 # Parsed axioms : 37989
% 7.59/130.74 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 37888
% 7.59/130.74 # Initial clauses : 104
% 7.59/130.74 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 8
% 7.59/130.74 # Initial clauses in saturation : 96
% 7.59/130.74 # Processed clauses : 134
% 7.59/130.74 # ...of these trivial : 5
% 7.59/130.74 # ...subsumed : 18
% 7.59/130.74 # ...remaining for further processing : 111
% 7.59/130.74 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 9
% 7.59/130.74 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 7.59/130.74 # Generated clauses : 58
% 7.59/130.74 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 38
% 7.59/130.74 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 51
% 7.59/130.74 # Paramodulations : 44
% 7.59/130.74 # Factorizations : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Equation resolutions : 14
% 7.59/130.74 # Current number of processed clauses : 107
% 7.59/130.74 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 42
% 7.59/130.74 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 7.59/130.74 # Non-unit-clauses : 64
% 7.59/130.74 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 7.59/130.74 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 7.59/130.74 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2282
% 7.59/130.74 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 358
% 7.59/130.74 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 69
% 7.59/130.74 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 27
% 7.59/130.74 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5
% 7.59/130.74 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 7.59/130.74 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Termbank termtop insertions : 257432
% 7.59/130.74
% 7.59/130.74 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.59/130.74 # User time : 0.448 s
% 7.59/130.74 # System time : 0.031 s
% 7.59/130.74 # Total time : 0.479 s
% 7.59/130.74 # Maximum resident set size: 54200 pages
% 7.59/130.74 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_75515770aeb32f68e33e9fbd9dff93f5a2e34f2e for 23 seconds:
% 7.59/130.74
% 7.59/130.74 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 7.59/130.74 # OLD status Res
% 7.59/130.74 # Preprocessing time : 1.325 s
% 7.59/130.74 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_6c565d2524e660970ec2a72c26d577f665a55420 for 23 seconds:
% 7.59/130.74
% 7.59/130.74 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 7.59/130.74 # OLD status Res
% 7.59/130.74 # Preprocessing time : 1.491 s
% 7.59/130.74 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_750456fc664a9e0b97096ad0f5110b1ead7d782b for 23 seconds:
% 7.59/130.74
% 7.59/130.74 # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 7.59/130.74 # OLD status Res
% 7.59/130.74 # Preprocessing time : 1.404 s
% 7.59/130.74 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_a9abcacdf80c460fdc9fe242616d68da2308faf5 for 23 seconds:
% 7.59/130.74 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 7.59/130.74 # Preprocessing time : 0.375 s
% 7.59/130.74
% 7.59/130.74 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 7.59/130.74 # OLD status GaveUp
% 7.59/130.74 # Parsed axioms : 37989
% 7.59/130.74 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 37915
% 7.59/130.74 # Initial clauses : 77
% 7.59/130.74 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 8
% 7.59/130.74 # Initial clauses in saturation : 69
% 7.59/130.74 # Processed clauses : 331
% 7.59/130.74 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 7.59/130.74 # ...subsumed : 3
% 7.59/130.74 # ...remaining for further processing : 324
% 7.59/130.74 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 7.59/130.74 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 1
% 7.59/130.74 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 7.59/130.74 # Generated clauses : 346
% 7.59/130.74 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 264
% 7.59/130.74 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Paramodulations : 342
% 7.59/130.74 # Factorizations : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Equation resolutions : 4
% 7.59/130.74 # Current number of processed clauses : 321
% 7.59/130.74 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 56
% 7.59/130.74 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 7.59/130.74 # Non-unit-clauses : 264
% 7.59/130.74 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 7.59/130.74 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 7.59/130.74 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3280
% 7.59/130.74 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2225
% 7.59/130.74 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 7.59/130.74 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20
% 7.59/130.74 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # BW rewrite match attempts : 350
% 7.59/130.74 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 7.59/130.74 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Termbank termtop insertions : 22538787
% 7.59/130.74
% 7.59/130.74 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.59/130.74 # User time : 8.348 s
% 7.59/130.74 # System time : 0.240 s
% 7.59/130.74 # Total time : 8.588 s
% 7.59/130.74 # Maximum resident set size: 444172 pages
% 7.59/130.74 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_e60008599937a0dc787316fd87bf9ff4d65ffb48 for 23 seconds:
% 7.59/130.74 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 7.59/130.74 # Preprocessing time : 0.439 s
% 7.59/130.74
% 7.59/130.74 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 7.59/130.74 # OLD status GaveUp
% 7.59/130.74 # Parsed axioms : 37989
% 7.59/130.74 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 37903
% 7.59/130.74 # Initial clauses : 89
% 7.59/130.74 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 8
% 7.59/130.74 # Initial clauses in saturation : 81
% 7.59/130.74 # Processed clauses : 118
% 7.59/130.74 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 7.59/130.74 # ...subsumed : 18
% 7.59/130.74 # ...remaining for further processing : 96
% 7.59/130.74 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 9
% 7.59/130.74 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 7.59/130.74 # Generated clauses : 64
% 7.59/130.74 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 37
% 7.59/130.74 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 51
% 7.59/130.74 # Paramodulations : 50
% 7.59/130.74 # Factorizations : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Equation resolutions : 14
% 7.59/130.74 # Current number of processed clauses : 93
% 7.59/130.74 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 27
% 7.59/130.74 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 7.59/130.74 # Non-unit-clauses : 65
% 7.59/130.74 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 7.59/130.74 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 7.59/130.74 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2378
% 7.59/130.74 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 374
% 7.59/130.74 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 69
% 7.59/130.74 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24
% 7.59/130.74 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 7.59/130.74 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 7.59/130.74 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.59/130.74 # Termbank termtop insertions : 257355
% 7.59/130.74
% 7.59/130.74 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.59/130.74 # User time : 0.417 s
% 7.59/130.74 # System time : 0.028 s
% 7.59/130.74 # Total time : 0.445 s
% 7.59/130.74 # Maximum resident set size: 54220 pages
% 7.59/130.74 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_03d534503f753dd3be02bb3c547fa7a3e34e825e for 23 seconds:
% 7.59/130.74 # Preprocessing time : 1.349 s
% 7.59/130.74
% 7.59/130.74 # Proof found!
% 7.59/130.74 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.59/130.74 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.60/130.74 # Proof object total steps : 48
% 7.60/130.74 # Proof object clause steps : 34
% 7.60/130.74 # Proof object formula steps : 14
% 7.60/130.74 # Proof object conjectures : 0
% 7.60/130.74 # Proof object clause conjectures : 0
% 7.60/130.74 # Proof object formula conjectures : 0
% 7.60/130.74 # Proof object initial clauses used : 10
% 7.60/130.74 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 7.60/130.74 # Proof object generating inferences : 22
% 7.60/130.74 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 13
% 7.60/130.74 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.60/130.74 # Parsed axioms : 37989
% 7.60/130.74 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.60/130.74 # Initial clauses : 41511
% 7.60/130.74 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 63
% 7.60/130.74 # Initial clauses in saturation : 41448
% 7.60/130.74 # Processed clauses : 44001
% 7.60/130.74 # ...of these trivial : 3099
% 7.60/130.74 # ...subsumed : 1538
% 7.60/130.74 # ...remaining for further processing : 39364
% 7.60/130.74 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2414
% 7.60/130.74 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 1191637
% 7.60/130.74 # Backward-subsumed : 804
% 7.60/130.74 # Backward-rewritten : 3897
% 7.60/130.74 # Generated clauses : 1429980
% 7.60/130.74 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 1425225
% 7.60/130.74 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1798
% 7.60/130.74 # Paramodulations : 1427184
% 7.60/130.74 # Factorizations : 23
% 7.60/130.74 # Equation resolutions : 2534
% 7.60/130.74 # Current number of processed clauses : 34413
% 7.60/130.74 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 27548
% 7.60/130.74 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 7.60/130.74 # Negative unit clauses : 128
% 7.60/130.74 # Non-unit-clauses : 6736
% 7.60/130.74 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 70724
% 7.60/130.74 # ...number of literals in the above : 99538
% 7.60/130.74 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.60/130.74 # Current number of archived clauses : 4940
% 7.60/130.74 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 24344158
% 7.60/130.74 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4706746
% 7.60/130.74 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3216
% 7.60/130.74 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4334272
% 7.60/130.74 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 31340
% 7.60/130.74 # BW rewrite match attempts : 47931
% 7.60/130.74 # BW rewrite match successes : 32290
% 7.60/130.74 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.60/130.74 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.60/130.74 # Termbank termtop insertions : 11838116
% 7.60/130.74
% 7.60/130.74 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.60/130.74 # User time : 20.636 s
% 7.60/130.74 # System time : 0.338 s
% 7.60/130.74 # Total time : 20.974 s
% 7.60/130.74 # Maximum resident set size: 430892 pages
% 7.60/134.34 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 7.60/134.38 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 7.60/134.38 eprover: No such file or directory
% 7.60/134.38 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 7.60/134.38 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------