TSTP Solution File: CSR074+4 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR074+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:28 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.77s 3.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  29 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   51 (   0 equ;  26 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2161,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3lmen9wx/lgb.p',i_0_2161) ).

cnf(i_0_573,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3lmen9wx/lgb.p',i_0_573) ).

cnf(i_0_2484,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3lmen9wx/lgb.p',i_0_2484) ).

cnf(i_0_1953,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X3,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3lmen9wx/lgb.p',i_0_1953) ).

cnf(i_0_691,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3lmen9wx/lgb.p',i_0_691) ).

cnf(i_0_801,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3lmen9wx/lgb.p',i_0_801) ).

cnf(i_0_2483,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
    | ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3lmen9wx/lgb.p',i_0_2483) ).

cnf(i_0_2468,plain,
    ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3lmen9wx/lgb.p',i_0_2468) ).

cnf(i_0_85,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3lmen9wx/lgb.p',i_0_85) ).

cnf(i_0_804,plain,
    ( inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3lmen9wx/lgb.p',i_0_804) ).

cnf(c_0_2495,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_2161 ).

cnf(c_0_2496,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    i_0_573 ).

cnf(c_0_2497,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
    i_0_2484 ).

cnf(c_0_2498,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X3,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_1953 ).

cnf(c_0_2499,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_691 ).

cnf(c_0_2500,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    i_0_801 ).

cnf(c_0_2501,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
    | ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
    i_0_2483 ).

cnf(c_0_2502,plain,
    ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
    i_0_2468 ).

cnf(c_0_2503,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
    i_0_85 ).

cnf(c_0_2504,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2495,c_0_2496]),c_0_2497])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2505,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X3)
    | ~ inregion(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2498,c_0_2499]) ).

cnf(c_0_2506,plain,
    geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2500,c_0_2497])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2507,plain,
    ( inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    i_0_804 ).

cnf(c_0_2508,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
    | ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2501,c_0_2502]) ).

cnf(c_0_2509,plain,
    mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2495,c_0_2503]),c_0_2504])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2510,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
    | ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2505,c_0_2506]) ).

cnf(c_0_2511,plain,
    inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2507,c_0_2497])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2512,negated_conjecture,
    ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2508,c_0_2509])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2513,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2510,c_0_2511]),c_0_2512]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : CSR074+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 20:21:31 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.80/1.04  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.80/1.04  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.80/1.04  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.80/1.04  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.77/3.63  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.77/3.63  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.77/3.63  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.77/3.63  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S063N
% 8.77/3.63  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosUPred.
% 8.77/3.63  #
% 8.77/3.63  # Preprocessing time       : 0.031 s
% 8.77/3.63  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.77/3.63  
% 8.77/3.63  # Proof found!
% 8.77/3.63  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.77/3.63  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.77/3.63  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.77/3.63  
% 8.77/3.63  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.77/3.63  # User time                : 0.077 s
% 8.77/3.63  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 8.77/3.63  # Total time               : 0.085 s
% 8.77/3.63  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 8.77/3.63  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------