TSTP Solution File: CSR074+2 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : CSR074+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:25:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 32.26s 32.45s
% Output : Refutation 32.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR074+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 22:46:18 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 32.26/32.45
% 32.26/32.45 SPASS V 3.9
% 32.26/32.45 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 32.26/32.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 32.26/32.45 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 32.26/32.45 SPASS derived 39221 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 36200 clauses.
% 32.26/32.45 SPASS allocated 124728 KBytes.
% 32.26/32.45 SPASS spent 0:0:30.50 on the problem.
% 32.26/32.45 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 32.26/32.45 0:00:00.19 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 32.26/32.45 0:00:00.60 for inferences.
% 32.26/32.45 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 32.26/32.45 0:0:27.33 for the reduction.
% 32.26/32.45
% 32.26/32.45
% 32.26/32.45 Here is a proof with depth 2, length 23 :
% 32.26/32.45 % SZS output start Refutation
% 32.26/32.45 1[0:Inp] || -> mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)*.
% 32.26/32.45 54[0:Inp] || -> genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt)*l.
% 32.26/32.45 173[0:Inp] || -> genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt)*l.
% 32.26/32.45 433[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) -> geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)*.
% 32.26/32.45 459[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)* -> inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74).
% 32.26/32.45 487[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)* -> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74).
% 32.26/32.45 996[0:Inp] || genlmt(u,v)*+ -> microtheory(u)*.
% 32.26/32.45 999[0:Inp] || geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)* inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) -> .
% 32.26/32.45 1007[0:Inp] || geographicalsubregions(u,v)* -> inregion(v,u).
% 32.26/32.45 1082[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)*+ -> mtvisible(v)*.
% 32.26/32.45 1109[0:Inp] || inregion(u,v)* inregion(v,w)* -> inregion(u,w)*.
% 32.26/32.45 1136[0:MRR:487.0,1.0] || -> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)*l.
% 32.26/32.45 1139[0:MRR:459.0,1.0] || -> inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)*l.
% 32.26/32.45 1147[0:Res:1136.0,1007.0] || -> inregion(c_georegion_l4_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)*r.
% 32.26/32.45 4252[0:Res:54.0,996.0] || -> microtheory(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)*.
% 32.26/32.45 5185[0:Res:433.1,999.0] || mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)* inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) -> .
% 32.26/32.45 5275[0:Res:173.0,1082.1] mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt) || -> mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)*.
% 32.26/32.45 5286[0:Res:54.0,1082.1] mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) || -> mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt)*.
% 32.26/32.45 5383[0:SSi:5286.0,1.0,4252.0] || -> mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt)*.
% 32.26/32.45 5384[0:MRR:5275.0,5383.0] || -> mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)*.
% 32.26/32.45 5402[0:MRR:5185.0,5384.0] || inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)*l -> .
% 32.26/32.45 40881[0:NCh:1109.2,1109.0,5402.0,1139.0] || inregion(c_georegion_l4_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)*r -> .
% 32.26/32.45 40882[0:MRR:40881.0,1147.0] || -> .
% 32.26/32.45 % SZS output end Refutation
% 32.26/32.45 Formulae used in the proof : query124 ax1_63 ax1_326 ax1_478 ax1_82 ax1_472 ax1_1127 ax1_128 ax1_1123 ax1_933
% 32.26/32.45
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------