TSTP Solution File: CSR074+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR074+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:28 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 5.05s 2.79s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.05s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  29 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   51 (   0 equ;  26 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_129,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66ltlr72/lgb.p',i_0_129) ).

cnf(i_0_680,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66ltlr72/lgb.p',i_0_680) ).

cnf(i_0_1066,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66ltlr72/lgb.p',i_0_1066) ).

cnf(i_0_998,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X3,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66ltlr72/lgb.p',i_0_998) ).

cnf(i_0_155,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66ltlr72/lgb.p',i_0_155) ).

cnf(i_0_519,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66ltlr72/lgb.p',i_0_519) ).

cnf(i_0_1065,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
    | ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66ltlr72/lgb.p',i_0_1065) ).

cnf(i_0_525,plain,
    ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66ltlr72/lgb.p',i_0_525) ).

cnf(i_0_367,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66ltlr72/lgb.p',i_0_367) ).

cnf(i_0_885,plain,
    ( inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-66ltlr72/lgb.p',i_0_885) ).

cnf(c_0_1077,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_129 ).

cnf(c_0_1078,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    i_0_680 ).

cnf(c_0_1079,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
    i_0_1066 ).

cnf(c_0_1080,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X3,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_998 ).

cnf(c_0_1081,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_155 ).

cnf(c_0_1082,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    i_0_519 ).

cnf(c_0_1083,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
    | ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
    i_0_1065 ).

cnf(c_0_1084,plain,
    ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
    i_0_525 ).

cnf(c_0_1085,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
    i_0_367 ).

cnf(c_0_1086,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1077,c_0_1078]),c_0_1079])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1087,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X3)
    | ~ inregion(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1080,c_0_1081]) ).

cnf(c_0_1088,plain,
    geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_1082,c_0_1079])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1089,plain,
    ( inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    i_0_885 ).

cnf(c_0_1090,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
    | ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1083,c_0_1084]) ).

cnf(c_0_1091,plain,
    mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1077,c_0_1085]),c_0_1086])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1092,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)
    | ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1087,c_0_1088]) ).

cnf(c_0_1093,plain,
    inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_1089,c_0_1079])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1094,negated_conjecture,
    ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_1090,c_0_1091])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1095,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1092,c_0_1093]),c_0_1094]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : CSR074+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 21:55:51 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.48  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 5.05/2.79  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 5.05/2.79  # No SInE strategy applied
% 5.05/2.79  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 5.05/2.79  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 5.05/2.79  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 5.05/2.79  #
% 5.05/2.79  # Preprocessing time       : 0.027 s
% 5.05/2.79  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.05/2.79  
% 5.05/2.79  # Proof found!
% 5.05/2.79  # SZS status Theorem
% 5.05/2.79  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.05/2.79  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 5.05/2.79  
% 5.05/2.79  # -------------------------------------------------
% 5.05/2.79  # User time                : 0.051 s
% 5.05/2.79  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 5.05/2.79  # Total time               : 0.059 s
% 5.05/2.79  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 5.05/2.79  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------