TSTP Solution File: CSR074+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : CSR074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:25:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.40s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : CSR074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 23:33:04 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.40  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.40  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.40  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.40  SPASS derived 30 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 71 clauses.
% 0.20/0.40  SPASS allocated 97713 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.40  SPASS spent	0:00:00.06 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.40  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.20/0.40  		0:00:00.02 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.40  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 21 :
% 0.20/0.40  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.40  1[0:Inp] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)*.
% 0.20/0.40  10[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt)*r.
% 0.20/0.40  11[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt)*r.
% 0.20/0.40  12[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)+ -> geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)*.
% 0.20/0.40  13[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)* -> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74).
% 0.20/0.40  14[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)* -> inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74).
% 0.20/0.40  45[0:Inp] || geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)* inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24) -> .
% 0.20/0.40  46[0:Inp] || geographicalsubregions(u,v)* -> inregion(v,u).
% 0.20/0.40  48[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)* -> mtvisible(v)*.
% 0.20/0.40  56[0:Inp] || inregion(u,v)* inregion(v,w)* -> inregion(u,w)*.
% 0.20/0.40  58[0:Inp] || genlmt(u,v)* genlmt(v,w)* -> genlmt(u,w)*.
% 0.20/0.40  60[0:MRR:14.0,1.0] ||  -> inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)*r.
% 0.20/0.40  61[0:MRR:13.0,1.0] ||  -> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)*l.
% 0.20/0.40  62[0:Res:1.0,48.0] || genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt,u)+ -> mtvisible(u)*.
% 0.20/0.40  65[0:Res:61.0,46.0] ||  -> inregion(c_georegion_l4_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)*r.
% 0.20/0.40  112[0:NCh:58.2,58.1,62.0,10.0] || genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt) -> mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)*.
% 0.20/0.40  116[0:MRR:112.0,11.0] ||  -> mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)*.
% 0.20/0.40  117[0:MRR:12.0,116.0] ||  -> geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)*.
% 0.20/0.40  119[0:MRR:45.0,117.0] || inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)*r+ -> .
% 0.20/0.40  120[0:NCh:56.2,56.1,119.0,65.0] || inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74)*r -> .
% 0.20/0.40  121[0:MRR:120.0,60.0] ||  -> .
% 0.20/0.40  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.40  Formulae used in the proof : query74 just8 just9 just10 just11 just12 just5 just49 just41 just54
% 0.20/0.40  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------