TSTP Solution File: CSR074+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : CSR074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:21:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.65s 1.84s
% Output : Refutation 1.65s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : CSR074+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 23:39:21 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.37 The process was started by sandbox2 on n025.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.37 Fri Jun 10 23:39:21 2022
% 0.13/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 26368.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.13/0.37 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.13/0.37 in usable.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlpreds(A,B)|predicate(B).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlpreds(A,B)|predicate(A).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 10 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -predicate(A)|genlpreds(A,A).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 32 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)|collection(B).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 33 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)|thing(A).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlmt(A,B)|microtheory(B).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 37 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlmt(A,B)|microtheory(A).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 39 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -microtheory(A)|genlmt(A,A).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 40
% 0.13/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 51
% 0.13/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 78
% 0.13/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 78
% 0.13/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 32
% 0.13/0.39 distinct predicate count: 18
% 0.13/0.39 distinct function count: 0
% 0.13/0.39 distinct constant count: 14
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39
% 0.13/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.65/1.84 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.65/1.84 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 6 [ 1 1 164 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 7 [ 1 1 182 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 8 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 9 [ 1 1 151 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 10 [ 1 0 290 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 11 [ 2 0 277 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 12 [ 1 3 152701 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 13 [ 1 0 2716 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 14 [ 3 0 183 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 15 [ 2 1 159 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 16 [ 3 1 469 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 17 [ 5 0 400 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 18 [ 2 0 2443 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 19 [ 3 0 716 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 20 [ 3 1 715 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 21 [ 3 0 175 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 22 [ 4 0 492 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 23 [ 9 0 153 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 24 [ 5 0 523 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 1.45 sec ----> 97 [hyper,90,40,78] {-} $F.
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Length of proof is 7. Level of proof is 3.
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.65/1.84 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.65/1.84 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 1 [] {+} -geographicalsubregions(A,B)|inregion(B,A).
% 1.65/1.84 2 [] {+} -mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)|geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24).
% 1.65/1.84 3 [] {+} -mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)|geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74).
% 1.65/1.84 4 [] {+} -mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)|inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74).
% 1.65/1.84 30 [] {+} -inregion(A,B)| -inregion(B,C)|inregion(A,C).
% 1.65/1.84 35 [] {+} -mtvisible(A)| -genlmt(A,B)|mtvisible(B).
% 1.65/1.84 38 [] {+} -genlmt(A,B)| -genlmt(B,C)|genlmt(A,C).
% 1.65/1.84 40 [] {+} -inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24)| -geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24).
% 1.65/1.84 47 [] {+} genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt).
% 1.65/1.84 48 [] {+} genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt).
% 1.65/1.84 51 [] {+} mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt).
% 1.65/1.84 56 [hyper,51,4] {+} inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74).
% 1.65/1.84 57 [hyper,51,3] {+} geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24,c_georegion_l4_x53_y74).
% 1.65/1.84 65 [hyper,57,1] {+} inregion(c_georegion_l4_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24).
% 1.65/1.84 70 [hyper,48,38,47] {-} genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt,c_worldgeographymt).
% 1.65/1.84 74 [hyper,70,35,51] {+} mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt).
% 1.65/1.84 78 [hyper,74,2] {+} geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x17_y24).
% 1.65/1.84 90 [hyper,65,30,56] {+} inregion(c_geolocation_x53_y74,c_georegion_l3_x17_y24).
% 1.65/1.84 97 [hyper,90,40,78] {-} $F.
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.65/1.84 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 ============ end of search ============
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 true clauses given 10 (28.6%)
% 1.65/1.84 false clauses given 25
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 FALSE TRUE
% 1.65/1.84 2 1 8
% 1.65/1.84 3 0 12
% 1.65/1.84 tot: 1 20 (95.2% true)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Model 24 [ 5 0 523 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.65/1.84
% 1.65/1.84 Process 26368 finished Fri Jun 10 23:39:23 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------