TSTP Solution File: CSR073+6 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR073+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:27 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 75.28s 66.93s
% Output : CNFRefutation 75.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 0 equ; 13 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2936,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_0rh9lnl/input.p',i_0_2936) ).
cnf(i_0_936,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member2677_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_0rh9lnl/input.p',i_0_936) ).
cnf(i_0_3938,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_0rh9lnl/input.p',i_0_3938) ).
cnf(i_0_3361,plain,
( tptptypes_7_396(c_tptpcol_15_5413,c_pushingababycarriage)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member2677_mt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_0rh9lnl/input.p',i_0_3361) ).
cnf(i_0_3937,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_5_387(X1,c_pushingababycarriage),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_0rh9lnl/input.p',i_0_3937) ).
cnf(i_0_1695,plain,
( tptptypes_5_387(X1,X2)
| ~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_0rh9lnl/input.p',i_0_1695) ).
cnf(i_0_942,plain,
( tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2)
| ~ tptptypes_7_396(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-_0rh9lnl/input.p',i_0_942) ).
cnf(c_0_3946,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
i_0_2936 ).
cnf(c_0_3947,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member2677_mt),
i_0_936 ).
cnf(c_0_3948,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
i_0_3938 ).
cnf(c_0_3949,plain,
( tptptypes_7_396(c_tptpcol_15_5413,c_pushingababycarriage)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member2677_mt) ),
i_0_3361 ).
cnf(c_0_3950,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member2677_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3946,c_0_3947]),c_0_3948])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3951,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_5_387(X1,c_pushingababycarriage),
i_0_3937 ).
cnf(c_0_3952,plain,
( tptptypes_5_387(X1,X2)
| ~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2) ),
i_0_1695 ).
cnf(c_0_3953,plain,
( tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2)
| ~ tptptypes_7_396(X1,X2) ),
i_0_942 ).
cnf(c_0_3954,plain,
tptptypes_7_396(c_tptpcol_15_5413,c_pushingababycarriage),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3949,c_0_3950])]) ).
cnf(c_0_3955,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,c_pushingababycarriage),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3951,c_0_3952]) ).
cnf(c_0_3956,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3953,c_0_3954]),c_0_3955]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : CSR073+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 17:37:26 EDT 2022
% 0.18/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 62.83/63.07 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 62.83/63.07 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 62.83/63.07 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 62.83/63.07 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 75.28/66.93 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 75.28/66.93 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 75.28/66.93 # Preprocessing time : 0.104 s
% 75.28/66.93
% 75.28/66.93 # Proof found!
% 75.28/66.93 # SZS status Theorem
% 75.28/66.93 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 75.28/66.93 # Proof object total steps : 18
% 75.28/66.93 # Proof object clause steps : 11
% 75.28/66.93 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 75.28/66.93 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 75.28/66.93 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 75.28/66.93 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 75.28/66.93 # Proof object initial clauses used : 7
% 75.28/66.93 # Proof object initial formulas used : 7
% 75.28/66.93 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 75.28/66.93 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5
% 75.28/66.93 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 75.28/66.93 # Parsed axioms : 3938
% 75.28/66.93 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 75.28/66.93 # Initial clauses : 3938
% 75.28/66.93 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 75.28/66.93 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3938
% 75.28/66.93 # Processed clauses : 4876
% 75.28/66.93 # ...of these trivial : 256
% 75.28/66.93 # ...subsumed : 178
% 75.28/66.93 # ...remaining for further processing : 4442
% 75.28/66.93 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 75.28/66.93 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 75.28/66.93 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 75.28/66.93 # Backward-rewritten : 330
% 75.28/66.93 # Generated clauses : 7890
% 75.28/66.93 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 7396
% 75.28/66.93 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 75.28/66.93 # Paramodulations : 7890
% 75.28/66.93 # Factorizations : 0
% 75.28/66.93 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 75.28/66.93 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 75.28/66.93 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 75.28/66.93 # Current number of processed clauses : 4109
% 75.28/66.93 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2781
% 75.28/66.93 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 75.28/66.93 # Negative unit clauses : 91
% 75.28/66.93 # Non-unit-clauses : 1237
% 75.28/66.93 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6030
% 75.28/66.93 # ...number of literals in the above : 9576
% 75.28/66.93 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 75.28/66.93 # Current number of archived clauses : 333
% 75.28/66.93 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 302037
% 75.28/66.93 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 213615
% 75.28/66.93 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 133
% 75.28/66.93 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 95096
% 75.28/66.93 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 75.28/66.93 # BW rewrite match attempts : 248
% 75.28/66.93 # BW rewrite match successes : 70
% 75.28/66.93 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 75.28/66.93 # Condensation successes : 0
% 75.28/66.93 # Termbank termtop insertions : 110404
% 75.28/66.93
% 75.28/66.93 # -------------------------------------------------
% 75.28/66.93 # User time : 0.354 s
% 75.28/66.93 # System time : 0.021 s
% 75.28/66.93 # Total time : 0.375 s
% 75.28/66.93 # ...preprocessing : 0.104 s
% 75.28/66.93 # ...main loop : 0.271 s
% 75.28/66.93 # Maximum resident set size: 32536 pages
% 75.28/66.93
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------