TSTP Solution File: CSR073+2 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : CSR073+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:35:49 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.71s 0.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   57 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   46 (  20   ~;  16   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   2 sgn  21   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query123,conjecture,
    ? [X5] :
      ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
     => tptptypes_5_387(X5,c_pushingababycarriage) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XCb9p413yB/E---3.1_21793.p',query123) ).

fof(ax1_409,axiom,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( tptptypes_7_396(X5,X6)
     => tptptypes_6_388(X5,X6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XCb9p413yB/E---3.1_21793.p',ax1_409) ).

fof(ax1_174,axiom,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( tptptypes_8_400(X5,X6)
     => tptptypes_7_396(X5,X6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XCb9p413yB/E---3.1_21793.p',ax1_174) ).

fof(ax1_1123,axiom,
    ! [X20,X21] :
      ( ( mtvisible(X20)
        & genlmt(X20,X21) )
     => mtvisible(X21) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XCb9p413yB/E---3.1_21793.p',ax1_1123) ).

fof(ax1_108,axiom,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( tptptypes_9_401(X5,X6)
     => tptptypes_8_400(X6,X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XCb9p413yB/E---3.1_21793.p',ax1_108) ).

fof(ax1_157,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member237_mt)
   => tptptypes_9_401(c_pushingababycarriage,c_tptpcol_16_10258) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XCb9p413yB/E---3.1_21793.p',ax1_157) ).

fof(ax1_198,axiom,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member237_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XCb9p413yB/E---3.1_21793.p',ax1_198) ).

fof(ax1_99,axiom,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( tptptypes_6_388(X5,X6)
     => tptptypes_5_387(X5,X6) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XCb9p413yB/E---3.1_21793.p',ax1_99) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X5] :
        ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
       => tptptypes_5_387(X5,c_pushingababycarriage) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query123]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X35,X36] :
      ( ~ tptptypes_7_396(X35,X36)
      | tptptypes_6_388(X35,X36) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_409])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X65,X66] :
      ( ~ tptptypes_8_400(X65,X66)
      | tptptypes_7_396(X65,X66) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_174])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X31,X32] :
      ( ~ mtvisible(X31)
      | ~ genlmt(X31,X32)
      | mtvisible(X32) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1123])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X22] :
      ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
      & ~ tptptypes_5_387(X22,c_pushingababycarriage) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2)
    | ~ tptptypes_7_396(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( tptptypes_7_396(X1,X2)
    | ~ tptptypes_8_400(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X41,X42] :
      ( ~ tptptypes_9_401(X41,X42)
      | tptptypes_8_400(X42,X41) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_108])])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member237_mt)
    | tptptypes_9_401(c_pushingababycarriage,c_tptpcol_16_10258) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_157])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ genlmt(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member237_mt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_198]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X23,X24] :
      ( ~ tptptypes_6_388(X23,X24)
      | tptptypes_5_387(X23,X24) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_99])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2)
    | ~ tptptypes_8_400(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( tptptypes_8_400(X2,X1)
    | ~ tptptypes_9_401(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( tptptypes_9_401(c_pushingababycarriage,c_tptpcol_16_10258)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member237_mt) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_member237_mt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptptypes_5_387(X1,c_pushingababycarriage),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( tptptypes_5_387(X1,X2)
    | ~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2)
    | ~ tptptypes_9_401(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    tptptypes_9_401(c_pushingababycarriage,c_tptpcol_16_10258),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,c_pushingababycarriage),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13  % Problem    : CSR073+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 15:12:08 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.22/0.52  Running first-order model finding
% 0.22/0.52  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XCb9p413yB/E---3.1_21793.p
% 0.71/0.61  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.71/0.61  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.71/0.61  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.71/0.61  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.71/0.61  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.71/0.61  # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.71/0.61  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.71/0.61  # sh5l with pid 21875 completed with status 0
% 0.71/0.61  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.71/0.61  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.71/0.61  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.71/0.61  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.71/0.61  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.71/0.61  # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.71/0.61  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.71/0.61  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.71/0.61  # Search class: FHHNM-FSMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.71/0.61  # partial match(2): FGHSM-FSMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.71/0.61  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.71/0.61  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 181s (1) cores
% 0.71/0.61  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with pid 21880 completed with status 0
% 0.71/0.61  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N
% 0.71/0.61  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.71/0.61  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.71/0.61  # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.71/0.61  # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.71/0.61  # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.71/0.61  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.71/0.61  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.71/0.61  # Search class: FHHNM-FSMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.71/0.61  # partial match(2): FGHSM-FSMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.71/0.61  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.71/0.61  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S032N with 181s (1) cores
% 0.71/0.61  # Preprocessing time       : 0.006 s
% 0.71/0.61  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.71/0.61  
% 0.71/0.61  # Proof found!
% 0.71/0.61  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.71/0.61  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.71/0.61  # Parsed axioms                        : 1132
% 0.71/0.61  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 887
% 0.71/0.61  # Initial clauses                      : 246
% 0.71/0.61  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.71/0.61  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 246
% 0.71/0.61  # Processed clauses                    : 912
% 0.71/0.61  # ...of these trivial                  : 11
% 0.71/0.61  # ...subsumed                          : 37
% 0.71/0.61  # ...remaining for further processing  : 864
% 0.71/0.61  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.71/0.61  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.71/0.61  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.71/0.61  # Backward-rewritten                   : 21
% 0.71/0.61  # Generated clauses                    : 962
% 0.71/0.61  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 628
% 0.71/0.61  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.71/0.61  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.71/0.61  # Paramodulations                      : 962
% 0.71/0.61  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.71/0.61  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.71/0.61  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.71/0.61  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.71/0.61  # Total rewrite steps                  : 281
% 0.71/0.61  # ...of those cached                   : 183
% 0.71/0.61  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.71/0.61  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.71/0.61  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.71/0.61  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.71/0.61  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.71/0.61  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.71/0.61  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.71/0.61  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.71/0.61  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.71/0.61  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.71/0.61  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.71/0.61  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.71/0.61  # Current number of processed clauses  : 606
% 0.71/0.61  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 314
% 0.71/0.61  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.71/0.61  #    Negative unit clauses             : 36
% 0.71/0.61  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 256
% 0.71/0.61  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 161
% 0.71/0.61  # ...number of literals in the above   : 327
% 0.71/0.61  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.71/0.61  # Current number of archived clauses   : 258
% 0.71/0.61  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 16902
% 0.71/0.61  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15190
% 0.71/0.61  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 22
% 0.71/0.61  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3536
% 0.71/0.61  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.71/0.61  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 9
% 0.71/0.61  # BW rewrite match successes           : 9
% 0.71/0.61  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.71/0.61  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.71/0.61  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 26318
% 0.71/0.61  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 5239
% 0.71/0.61  
% 0.71/0.61  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.71/0.61  # User time                : 0.064 s
% 0.71/0.61  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.71/0.61  # Total time               : 0.072 s
% 0.71/0.61  # Maximum resident set size: 4640 pages
% 0.71/0.61  
% 0.71/0.61  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.71/0.61  # User time                : 0.075 s
% 0.71/0.61  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.71/0.61  # Total time               : 0.084 s
% 0.71/0.61  # Maximum resident set size: 2660 pages
% 0.71/0.61  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------