TSTP Solution File: CSR071+2 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : CSR071+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:25:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 2.41s 2.61s
% Output : Refutation 2.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR071+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 01:42:12 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 2.41/2.61
% 2.41/2.61 SPASS V 3.9
% 2.41/2.61 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 2.41/2.61 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.41/2.61 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.41/2.61 SPASS derived 3777 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 3808 clauses.
% 2.41/2.61 SPASS allocated 101189 KBytes.
% 2.41/2.61 SPASS spent 0:00:02.20 on the problem.
% 2.41/2.61 0:00:00.05 for the input.
% 2.41/2.61 0:00:00.20 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 2.41/2.61 0:00:00.13 for inferences.
% 2.41/2.61 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 2.41/2.61 0:00:01.44 for the reduction.
% 2.41/2.61
% 2.41/2.61
% 2.41/2.61 Here is a proof with depth 3, length 19 :
% 2.41/2.61 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.41/2.61 1[0:Inp] || -> mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)*.
% 2.41/2.61 236[0:Inp] || -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member698_mt)*l.
% 2.41/2.61 238[0:Inp] || -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1672_mt)*l.
% 2.41/2.61 288[0:Inp] || tptpofobject(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414))* -> .
% 2.41/2.61 319[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt) -> navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3)*.
% 2.41/2.61 373[0:Inp] navypersonnel(u) || -> militaryperson(u)*.
% 2.41/2.61 997[0:Inp] || genlmt(u,v)*+ -> microtheory(u)*.
% 2.41/2.61 1082[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)*+ -> mtvisible(v)*.
% 2.41/2.61 1091[0:Inp] militaryperson(u) || mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) -> tptpofobject(u,f_tptpquantityfn_6(n_414))*.
% 2.41/2.61 1135[0:Res:1091.2,288.0] militaryperson(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3) || mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)* -> .
% 2.41/2.61 1630[0:SoR:1135.0,373.1] navypersonnel(c_tptpnavypersonnel_3) || mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)* -> .
% 2.41/2.61 1633[0:SoR:1630.0,319.1] || mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt) mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)* -> .
% 2.41/2.61 4199[0:Res:238.0,997.0] || -> microtheory(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)*.
% 2.41/2.61 5158[0:Res:238.0,1082.1] mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt) || -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)*.
% 2.41/2.61 5159[0:Res:236.0,1082.1] mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt) || -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)*.
% 2.41/2.61 5287[0:SSi:5158.0,1.0,4199.0] || -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member1672_mt)*.
% 2.41/2.61 5289[0:MRR:1633.1,5287.0] || mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)* -> .
% 2.41/2.61 5293[0:SSi:5159.0,1.0,4199.0] || -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member698_mt)*.
% 2.41/2.61 5294[0:MRR:5293.0,5289.0] || -> .
% 2.41/2.61 % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.41/2.61 Formulae used in the proof : query121 ax1_448 ax1_453 ax1_91 ax1_284 ax1_1127 ax1_1123 ax1_495
% 2.41/2.61
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------