TSTP Solution File: CSR069+2 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR069+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:18:00 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.37s 0.54s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query119,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query119) ).
fof(ax1_463,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_463) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query119]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_463])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt)
& ~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member1_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(c_georegion_l4_x38_y24,c_georegion_l4_x39_y24),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : CSR069+2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 19 01:50:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.49 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.54 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.37/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # new_bool_3 with pid 5515 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.37/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.37/0.54 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.54 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 61s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 5520 completed with status 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.37/0.54 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.37/0.54 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.37/0.54 # Search class: FHUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.37/0.54 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 61s (1) cores
% 0.37/0.54 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.37/0.54 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.37/0.54
% 0.37/0.54 # Proof found!
% 0.37/0.54 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.37/0.54 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/0.54 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.37/0.54 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1114
% 0.37/0.54 # Initial clauses : 19
% 0.37/0.54 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Initial clauses in saturation : 19
% 0.37/0.54 # Processed clauses : 3
% 0.37/0.54 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # ...remaining for further processing : 2
% 0.37/0.54 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # NegExts : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.37/0.54 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.54 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.54 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.54 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.54 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.54 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.37/0.54 # Current number of processed clauses : 2
% 0.37/0.54 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.37/0.54 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.37/0.54 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16
% 0.37/0.54 # ...number of literals in the above : 32
% 0.37/0.54 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.37/0.54 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8015
% 0.37/0.54 # Search garbage collected termcells : 4903
% 0.37/0.54
% 0.37/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.54 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.37/0.54 # System time : 0.009 s
% 0.37/0.54 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.37/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 4096 pages
% 0.37/0.54
% 0.37/0.54 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.37/0.54 # User time : 0.030 s
% 0.37/0.54 # System time : 0.019 s
% 0.37/0.54 # Total time : 0.049 s
% 0.37/0.54 # Maximum resident set size: 2652 pages
% 0.37/0.54 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------