TSTP Solution File: CSR066+3 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : CSR066+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:33:23 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.69s 0.87s
% Output : Refutation 0.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 31 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 63 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 55 ( 23 ~; 15 |; 6 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 11 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 6 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 34 !; 3 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f8201,plain,
$false,
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f8144,f8195,f8152]) ).
fof(f8152,plain,
! [X0] :
( isa(X0,c_shavingrazor_manual)
| ~ shavingrazor_manual(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8111]) ).
fof(f8111,plain,
! [X0] :
( isa(X0,c_shavingrazor_manual)
| ~ shavingrazor_manual(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8013]) ).
fof(f8013,plain,
! [X0] :
( shavingrazor_manual(X0)
=> isa(X0,c_shavingrazor_manual) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f7743]) ).
fof(f7743,axiom,
! [X14] :
( shavingrazor_manual(X14)
=> isa(X14,c_shavingrazor_manual) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_7743) ).
fof(f8195,plain,
~ isa(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_shavingrazor_manual),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f8160,f8193,f8164]) ).
fof(f8164,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,X2,X3,X1),X3)
| ~ relationexistsall(X2,X3,X1)
| ~ isa(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8118]) ).
fof(f8118,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,X2,X3,X1),X3)
| ~ relationexistsall(X2,X3,X1)
| ~ isa(X0,X1) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f8117]) ).
fof(f8117,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,X2,X3,X1),X3)
| ~ relationexistsall(X2,X3,X1)
| ~ isa(X0,X1) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8019]) ).
fof(f8019,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ( relationexistsall(X2,X3,X1)
& isa(X0,X1) )
=> isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,X2,X3,X1),X3) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f3919]) ).
fof(f3919,axiom,
! [X6,X7,X8,X9] :
( ( relationexistsall(X8,X9,X7)
& isa(X6,X7) )
=> isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X6,X8,X9,X7),X9) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_3919) ).
fof(f8193,plain,
~ isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),c_tptpcol_16_25972),
inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f8188,f8150]) ).
fof(f8150,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ isa(X0,c_tptpcol_16_25972)
| tptpcol_16_25972(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8108]) ).
fof(f8108,plain,
! [X0] :
( tptpcol_16_25972(X0)
| ~ isa(X0,c_tptpcol_16_25972) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8011]) ).
fof(f8011,plain,
! [X0] :
( isa(X0,c_tptpcol_16_25972)
=> tptpcol_16_25972(X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f5089]) ).
fof(f5089,axiom,
! [X14] :
( isa(X14,c_tptpcol_16_25972)
=> tptpcol_16_25972(X14) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_5089) ).
fof(f8188,plain,
~ tptpcol_16_25972(f_relationexistsallfn(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual)),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f8186,f8144]) ).
fof(f8186,plain,
( ~ tptpcol_16_25972(f_relationexistsallfn(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual))
| ~ shavingrazor_manual(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f8140,f8161]) ).
fof(f8161,plain,
! [X0] :
( tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X0)
| ~ shavingrazor_manual(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8114]) ).
fof(f8114,plain,
! [X0] :
( tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X0)
| ~ shavingrazor_manual(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8016]) ).
fof(f8016,plain,
! [X0] :
( shavingrazor_manual(X0)
=> tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f3627]) ).
fof(f3627,axiom,
! [X6] :
( shavingrazor_manual(X6)
=> tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X6,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_3627) ).
fof(f8140,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ tptp_8_271(X0,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual)
| ~ tptpcol_16_25972(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8104]) ).
fof(f8104,plain,
! [X0] :
( ( ~ tptpcol_16_25972(X0)
| ~ tptp_8_271(X0,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual) )
& mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8008]) ).
fof(f8008,plain,
~ ? [X0] :
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21))
=> ( tptpcol_16_25972(X0)
& tptp_8_271(X0,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f8007]) ).
fof(f8007,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X14] :
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21))
=> ( tptpcol_16_25972(X14)
& tptp_8_271(X14,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual) ) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f8006]) ).
fof(f8006,conjecture,
? [X14] :
( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21))
=> ( tptpcol_16_25972(X14)
& tptp_8_271(X14,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query166) ).
fof(f8160,plain,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3628]) ).
fof(f3628,axiom,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_3628) ).
fof(f8144,plain,
shavingrazor_manual(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f195]) ).
fof(f195,axiom,
shavingrazor_manual(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_195) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : CSR066+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sun May 19 00:49:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.14/0.36 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.62/0.85 % (5097)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.62/0.85 % (5091)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.62/0.85 % (5092)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.62/0.85 % (5093)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.62/0.85 % (5094)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.62/0.85 % (5095)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.62/0.85 % (5096)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.69/0.86 % (5098)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.69/0.86 % (5094)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (5094)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.86 % (5094)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.69/0.86 % (5094)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.69/0.86
% 0.69/0.86 % (5094)Memory used [KB]: 6097
% 0.69/0.86 % (5094)Time elapsed: 0.019 s
% 0.69/0.86 % (5094)Instructions burned: 29 (million)
% 0.69/0.86 % (5096)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (5096)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.86 % (5096)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.69/0.86 % (5096)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.69/0.86
% 0.69/0.86 % (5096)Memory used [KB]: 6098
% 0.69/0.86 % (5096)Time elapsed: 0.019 s
% 0.69/0.86 % (5096)Instructions burned: 31 (million)
% 0.69/0.86 % (5097)First to succeed.
% 0.69/0.87 % (5097)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-5090"
% 0.69/0.87 % (5093)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.69/0.87 % (5095)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.69/0.87 % (5095)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.87 % (5095)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.69/0.87 % (5095)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.69/0.87 % (5095)Termination phase: Preprocessing 1
% 0.69/0.87
% 0.69/0.87 % (5095)Memory used [KB]: 6352
% 0.69/0.87 % (5095)Time elapsed: 0.021 s
% 0.69/0.87 % (5095)Instructions burned: 35 (million)
% 0.69/0.87 % (5095)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.87 % (5095)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.87 % (5091)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.69/0.87 % (5091)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.87 % (5091)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.69/0.87 % (5091)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.69/0.87 % (5091)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.69/0.87
% 0.69/0.87 % (5091)Memory used [KB]: 6129
% 0.69/0.87 % (5091)Time elapsed: 0.022 s
% 0.69/0.87 % (5091)Instructions burned: 35 (million)
% 0.69/0.87 % (5091)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.87 % (5091)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.87 % (5094)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.87 % (5094)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.87 % (5096)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.87 % (5096)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.87 % (5097)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.69/0.87 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.69/0.87 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.69/0.87 % (5097)------------------------------
% 0.69/0.87 % (5097)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.69/0.87 % (5097)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.69/0.87
% 0.69/0.87 % (5097)Memory used [KB]: 6139
% 0.69/0.87 % (5097)Time elapsed: 0.020 s
% 0.69/0.87 % (5097)Instructions burned: 64 (million)
% 0.69/0.87 % (5090)Success in time 0.492 s
% 0.69/0.87 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------