TSTP Solution File: CSR066+3 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : CSR066+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 19:17:57 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.41s 0.65s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   40 (  17   ~;  13   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   0 sgn  15   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax2_453,axiom,
    ! [X7,X8,X9,X10] :
      ( ( isa(X7,X8)
        & relationexistsall(X9,X10,X8) )
     => isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X7,X9,X10,X8),X10) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_453) ).

fof(ax2_7743,axiom,
    ! [X15] :
      ( shavingrazor_manual(X15)
     => isa(X15,c_shavingrazor_manual) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7743) ).

fof(query166,conjecture,
    ? [X15] :
      ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21))
     => ( tptp_8_271(X15,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual)
        & tptpcol_16_25972(X15) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query166) ).

fof(ax2_3628,axiom,
    relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_3628) ).

fof(ax2_195,axiom,
    shavingrazor_manual(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_195) ).

fof(ax2_3627,axiom,
    ! [X7] :
      ( shavingrazor_manual(X7)
     => tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X7,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X7) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_3627) ).

fof(ax2_5089,axiom,
    ! [X15] :
      ( isa(X15,c_tptpcol_16_25972)
     => tptpcol_16_25972(X15) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_5089) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X35,X36,X37,X38] :
      ( ~ isa(X35,X36)
      | ~ relationexistsall(X37,X38,X36)
      | isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X35,X37,X38,X36),X38) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_453])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X31] :
      ( ~ shavingrazor_manual(X31)
      | isa(X31,c_shavingrazor_manual) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7743])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X15] :
        ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21))
       => ( tptp_8_271(X15,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual)
          & tptpcol_16_25972(X15) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query166]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X3,X4,X2),X4)
    | ~ isa(X1,X2)
    | ~ relationexistsall(X3,X4,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_3628]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( isa(X1,c_shavingrazor_manual)
    | ~ shavingrazor_manual(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    shavingrazor_manual(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_195]) ).

fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X23] :
      ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21))
      & ( ~ tptp_8_271(X23,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual)
        | ~ tptpcol_16_25972(X23) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X28] :
      ( ~ shavingrazor_manual(X28)
      | tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X28,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X28) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_3627])])]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X24] :
      ( ~ isa(X24,c_tptpcol_16_25972)
      | tptpcol_16_25972(X24) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_5089])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),c_tptpcol_16_25972)
    | ~ isa(X1,c_shavingrazor_manual) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    isa(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_shavingrazor_manual),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ tptp_8_271(X1,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual)
    | ~ tptpcol_16_25972(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X1)
    | ~ shavingrazor_manual(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( tptpcol_16_25972(X1)
    | ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_25972) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),c_tptpcol_16_25972),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptpcol_16_25972(f_relationexistsallfn(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : CSR066+3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 00:49:23 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.46  Running first-order model finding
% 0.18/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.41/0.64  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.41/0.64  # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.64  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.64  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/0.64  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.64  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.64  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.64  # new_bool_3 with pid 21062 completed with status 0
% 0.41/0.64  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.41/0.64  # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.64  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.64  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/0.64  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.64  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.41/0.64  # Search class: FHHNS-FFSM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.41/0.64  # partial match(1): FHHNS-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.41/0.64  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.41/0.64  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 181s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.64  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with pid 21065 completed with status 0
% 0.41/0.64  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 0.41/0.64  # Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.41/0.65  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.41/0.65  # Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.41/0.65  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.65  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.41/0.65  # Search class: FHHNS-FFSM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.41/0.65  # partial match(1): FHHNS-FFMM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.41/0.65  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.41/0.65  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 181s (1) cores
% 0.41/0.65  # Preprocessing time       : 0.007 s
% 0.41/0.65  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.41/0.65  
% 0.41/0.65  # Proof found!
% 0.41/0.65  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.41/0.65  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.41/0.65  # Parsed axioms                        : 8006
% 0.41/0.65  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7978
% 0.41/0.65  # Initial clauses                      : 29
% 0.41/0.65  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.41/0.65  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 29
% 0.41/0.65  # Processed clauses                    : 71
% 0.41/0.65  # ...of these trivial                  : 4
% 0.41/0.65  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.41/0.65  # ...remaining for further processing  : 65
% 0.41/0.65  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.41/0.65  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.41/0.65  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.41/0.65  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.41/0.65  # Generated clauses                    : 27
% 0.41/0.65  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 18
% 0.41/0.65  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.41/0.65  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.41/0.65  # Paramodulations                      : 27
% 0.41/0.65  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.41/0.65  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.41/0.65  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.41/0.65  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.41/0.65  # Total rewrite steps                  : 15
% 0.41/0.65  # ...of those cached                   : 8
% 0.41/0.65  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.41/0.65  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.41/0.65  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.41/0.65  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.41/0.65  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.41/0.65  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.41/0.65  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.41/0.65  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.41/0.65  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.41/0.65  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.41/0.65  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.41/0.65  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.41/0.65  # Current number of processed clauses  : 41
% 0.41/0.65  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 20
% 0.41/0.65  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.41/0.65  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.41/0.65  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 20
% 0.41/0.65  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.41/0.65  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.41/0.65  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.41/0.65  # Current number of archived clauses   : 24
% 0.41/0.65  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 110
% 0.41/0.65  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 104
% 0.41/0.65  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.41/0.65  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.41/0.65  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.41/0.65  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.41/0.65  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.41/0.65  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.41/0.65  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.41/0.65  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 52588
% 0.41/0.65  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 31069
% 0.41/0.65  
% 0.41/0.65  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.65  # User time                : 0.033 s
% 0.41/0.65  # System time              : 0.017 s
% 0.41/0.65  # Total time               : 0.049 s
% 0.41/0.65  # Maximum resident set size: 18128 pages
% 0.41/0.65  
% 0.41/0.65  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.41/0.65  # User time                : 0.147 s
% 0.41/0.65  # System time              : 0.029 s
% 0.41/0.65  # Total time               : 0.176 s
% 0.41/0.65  # Maximum resident set size: 7960 pages
% 0.41/0.65  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------