TSTP Solution File: CSR066+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : CSR066+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 15:59:13 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.54s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   32 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   64 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   56 (  24   ~;  18   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (  35   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f386,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f385,f239]) ).

fof(f239,plain,
    shavingrazor_manual(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    shavingrazor_manual(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just11) ).

fof(f385,plain,
    ~ shavingrazor_manual(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual),
    inference(resolution,[],[f384,f258]) ).

fof(f258,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X0)
      | ~ shavingrazor_manual(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f205]) ).

fof(f205,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X0)
      | ~ shavingrazor_manual(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( shavingrazor_manual(X0)
     => tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just9) ).

fof(f384,plain,
    ~ tptp_8_271(f_relationexistsallfn(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual),
    inference(resolution,[],[f382,f250]) ).

fof(f250,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ tptpcol_16_25972(X0)
      | ~ tptp_8_271(X0,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f180]) ).

fof(f180,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ~ tptp_8_271(X0,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual)
        | ~ tptpcol_16_25972(X0) )
      & mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f127]) ).

fof(f127,plain,
    ~ ? [X0] :
        ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21))
       => ( tptp_8_271(X0,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual)
          & tptpcol_16_25972(X0) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f75]) ).

fof(f75,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X12] :
        ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21))
       => ( tptp_8_271(X12,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual)
          & tptpcol_16_25972(X12) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f74]) ).

fof(f74,conjecture,
    ? [X12] :
      ( mtvisible(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_webnjiteducjohnsontreebiochhtm)),c_translation_21))
     => ( tptp_8_271(X12,c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual)
        & tptpcol_16_25972(X12) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query66) ).

fof(f382,plain,
    tptpcol_16_25972(f_relationexistsallfn(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual)),
    inference(resolution,[],[f381,f271]) ).

fof(f271,plain,
    isa(c_theprototypicalshavingrazor_manual,c_shavingrazor_manual),
    inference(resolution,[],[f224,f239]) ).

fof(f224,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ shavingrazor_manual(X0)
      | isa(X0,c_shavingrazor_manual) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f187]) ).

fof(f187,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ shavingrazor_manual(X0)
      | isa(X0,c_shavingrazor_manual) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f80]) ).

fof(f80,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( shavingrazor_manual(X0)
     => isa(X0,c_shavingrazor_manual) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f31]) ).

fof(f31,axiom,
    ! [X12] :
      ( shavingrazor_manual(X12)
     => isa(X12,c_shavingrazor_manual) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just31) ).

fof(f381,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ isa(X0,c_shavingrazor_manual)
      | tptpcol_16_25972(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f319,f237]) ).

fof(f237,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ isa(X0,c_tptpcol_16_25972)
      | tptpcol_16_25972(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f193]) ).

fof(f193,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( tptpcol_16_25972(X0)
      | ~ isa(X0,c_tptpcol_16_25972) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f94]) ).

fof(f94,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( isa(X0,c_tptpcol_16_25972)
     => tptpcol_16_25972(X0) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f32]) ).

fof(f32,axiom,
    ! [X12] :
      ( isa(X12,c_tptpcol_16_25972)
     => tptpcol_16_25972(X12) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just32) ).

fof(f319,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),c_tptpcol_16_25972)
      | ~ isa(X0,c_shavingrazor_manual) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f225,f246]) ).

fof(f246,plain,
    relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f10,axiom,
    relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_271,c_tptpcol_16_25972,c_shavingrazor_manual),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just10) ).

fof(f225,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ relationexistsall(X3,X2,X1)
      | isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,X3,X2,X1),X2)
      | ~ isa(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f208]) ).

fof(f208,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ isa(X0,X1)
      | ~ relationexistsall(X3,X2,X1)
      | isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,X3,X2,X1),X2) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f198]) ).

fof(f198,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X3,X2] :
      ( ~ isa(X0,X1)
      | ~ relationexistsall(X2,X3,X1)
      | isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,X2,X3,X1),X3) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f197]) ).

fof(f197,plain,
    ! [X3,X2,X1,X0] :
      ( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,X2,X3,X1),X3)
      | ~ isa(X0,X1)
      | ~ relationexistsall(X2,X3,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X3,X2,X1,X0] :
      ( ( isa(X0,X1)
        & relationexistsall(X2,X3,X1) )
     => isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X0,X2,X3,X1),X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just4) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : CSR066+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 18:46:18 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.53  % (26050)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.20/0.53  % (26065)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/467Mi)
% 0.20/0.53  % (26057)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.20/0.53  % (26048)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.53  % (26050)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.20/0.53  % (26050)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53  % (26050)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.53  % (26050)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.53  % (26050)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.20/0.53  % (26050)Termination phase: Blocked clause elimination
% 0.20/0.53  
% 0.20/0.53  % (26050)Memory used [KB]: 1023
% 0.20/0.53  % (26050)Time elapsed: 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.53  % (26050)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.20/0.53  % (26050)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53  % (26050)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53  TRYING [1]
% 0.20/0.53  TRYING [2]
% 0.20/0.54  TRYING [3]
% 0.20/0.54  % (26065)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.54  % (26065)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.54  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.54  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.54  % (26065)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54  % (26065)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.54  % (26065)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.54  % (26065)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.54  
% 0.20/0.54  % (26065)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.20/0.54  % (26065)Time elapsed: 0.071 s
% 0.20/0.54  % (26065)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.20/0.54  % (26065)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54  % (26065)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54  % (26041)Success in time 0.184 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------