TSTP Solution File: CSR065+4 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : CSR065+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:35:39 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 32.75s 17.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 32.75s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 47 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 15 ~; 12 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query215,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rZAHGb1z6o/E---3.1_23293.p',query215) ).
fof(ax3_44208,axiom,
! [X22,X23] :
( ( mtvisible(X22)
& genlmt(X22,X23) )
=> mtvisible(X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rZAHGb1z6o/E---3.1_23293.p',ax3_44208) ).
fof(ax3_773,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_member1489_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rZAHGb1z6o/E---3.1_23293.p',ax3_773) ).
fof(ax3_4764,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1489_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rZAHGb1z6o/E---3.1_23293.p',ax3_4764) ).
fof(ax3_23519,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member235_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rZAHGb1z6o/E---3.1_23293.p',ax3_23519) ).
fof(ax3_86,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rZAHGb1z6o/E---3.1_23293.p',ax3_86) ).
fof(ax3_934,axiom,
! [X6] :
( ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)
& ridgeline_topographical(X6) )
=> tptpofobject(X6,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rZAHGb1z6o/E---3.1_23293.p',ax3_934) ).
fof(ax3_6660,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
=> ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rZAHGb1z6o/E---3.1_23293.p',ax3_6660) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query215]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X24054,X24055] :
( ~ mtvisible(X24054)
| ~ genlmt(X24054,X24055)
| mtvisible(X24055) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44208])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
& ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( mtvisible(X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member1489_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_773]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1489_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_4764]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member235_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_23519]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_86]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X221] :
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)
| ~ ridgeline_topographical(X221)
| tptpofobject(X221,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_934])])]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_6660])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member1489_mt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member1489_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_15]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468))
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)
| ~ ridgeline_topographical(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
$false,
inference(cdclpropres,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20,c_0_21,c_0_22,c_0_23,c_0_24,c_0_25]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : CSR065+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 15:08:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 13.16/13.37 Running first-order model finding
% 13.16/13.37 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.rZAHGb1z6o/E---3.1_23293.p
% 32.75/17.62 # Version: 3.1.0
% 32.75/17.62 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 32.75/17.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 32.75/17.62 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 32.75/17.62 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 32.75/17.62 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 32.75/17.62 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 32.75/17.62 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with pid 23370 completed with status 0
% 32.75/17.62 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 32.75/17.62 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 32.75/17.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 32.75/17.62 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 32.75/17.62 # No SInE strategy applied
% 32.75/17.62 # Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 32.75/17.62 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1498 seconds (1498 total)
% 32.75/17.62 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 899s (1) cores
% 32.75/17.62 # Starting G----_0021_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S4S with 150s (1) cores
% 32.75/17.62 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 150s (1) cores
% 32.75/17.62 # Starting new_bool_3 with 150s (1) cores
% 32.75/17.62 # Starting new_bool_1 with 149s (1) cores
% 32.75/17.62 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with pid 23381 completed with status 0
% 32.75/17.62 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN
% 32.75/17.62 # Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 32.75/17.62 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 32.75/17.62 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 32.75/17.62 # No SInE strategy applied
% 32.75/17.62 # Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 32.75/17.62 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 5 cores with 1498 seconds (1498 total)
% 32.75/17.62 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 899s (1) cores
% 32.75/17.62 # Preprocessing time : 0.514 s
% 32.75/17.62 # SatCheck found unsatisfiable ground set
% 32.75/17.62
% 32.75/17.62 # Proof found!
% 32.75/17.62 # SZS status Theorem
% 32.75/17.62 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 32.75/17.62 # Parsed axioms : 44217
% 32.75/17.62 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 32.75/17.62 # Initial clauses : 44218
% 32.75/17.62 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 32.75/17.62 # Initial clauses in saturation : 44215
% 32.75/17.62 # Processed clauses : 5376
% 32.75/17.62 # ...of these trivial : 199
% 32.75/17.62 # ...subsumed : 177
% 32.75/17.62 # ...remaining for further processing : 5000
% 32.75/17.62 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 32.75/17.62 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 32.75/17.62 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 32.75/17.62 # Backward-rewritten : 36
% 32.75/17.62 # Generated clauses : 5388
% 32.75/17.62 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4282
% 32.75/17.62 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 32.75/17.62 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 32.75/17.62 # Paramodulations : 5386
% 32.75/17.62 # Factorizations : 0
% 32.75/17.62 # NegExts : 0
% 32.75/17.62 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 32.75/17.62 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 32.75/17.62 # Total rewrite steps : 1472
% 32.75/17.62 # ...of those cached : 1231
% 32.75/17.62 # Propositional unsat checks : 1
% 32.75/17.62 # Propositional check models : 0
% 32.75/17.62 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 1
% 32.75/17.62 # Propositional clauses : 48083
% 32.75/17.62 # Propositional clauses after purity: 17399
% 32.75/17.62 # Propositional unsat core size : 7
% 32.75/17.62 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 32.75/17.62 # Propositional encoding time : 0.056
% 32.75/17.62 # Propositional solver time : 0.008
% 32.75/17.62 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 32.75/17.62 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.056
% 32.75/17.62 # Success case prop solver time : 0.008
% 32.75/17.62 # Current number of processed clauses : 4962
% 32.75/17.62 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2702
% 32.75/17.62 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 32.75/17.62 # Negative unit clauses : 99
% 32.75/17.62 # Non-unit-clauses : 2161
% 32.75/17.62 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 43121
% 32.75/17.62 # ...number of literals in the above : 62523
% 32.75/17.62 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 32.75/17.62 # Current number of archived clauses : 36
% 32.75/17.62 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1421816
% 32.75/17.62 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1253635
% 32.75/17.62 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 177
% 32.75/17.62 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 54362
% 32.75/17.62 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 32.75/17.62 # BW rewrite match attempts : 38
% 32.75/17.62 # BW rewrite match successes : 36
% 32.75/17.62 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 32.75/17.62 # Condensation successes : 0
% 32.75/17.62 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1724727
% 32.75/17.62 # Search garbage collected termcells : 183137
% 32.75/17.62
% 32.75/17.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 32.75/17.62 # User time : 3.645 s
% 32.75/17.62 # System time : 0.193 s
% 32.75/17.62 # Total time : 3.838 s
% 32.75/17.62 # Maximum resident set size: 103324 pages
% 32.75/17.62
% 32.75/17.62 # -------------------------------------------------
% 32.75/17.62 # User time : 7.450 s
% 32.75/17.62 # System time : 0.549 s
% 32.75/17.62 # Total time : 7.999 s
% 32.75/17.62 # Maximum resident set size: 34600 pages
% 32.75/17.62 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------