TSTP Solution File: CSR065+2 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : CSR065+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:55 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.40s 2.63s
% Output   : Refutation 2.40s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem  : CSR065+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 15:10:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 2.40/2.63  
% 2.40/2.63  SPASS V 3.9 
% 2.40/2.63  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 2.40/2.63  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.40/2.63  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 2.40/2.63  SPASS derived 3727 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 3764 clauses.
% 2.40/2.63  SPASS allocated 101160 KBytes.
% 2.40/2.63  SPASS spent	0:00:02.22 on the problem.
% 2.40/2.63  		0:00:00.05 for the input.
% 2.40/2.63  		0:00:00.21 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 2.40/2.63  		0:00:00.12 for inferences.
% 2.40/2.63  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 2.40/2.63  		0:00:01.47 for the reduction.
% 2.40/2.63  
% 2.40/2.63  
% 2.40/2.63  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 23 :
% 2.40/2.63  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.40/2.63  1[0:Inp] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)*.
% 2.40/2.63  140[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt)*r.
% 2.40/2.63  169[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_member3993_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*r.
% 2.40/2.63  194[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member3993_mt)*l.
% 2.40/2.63  223[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member235_mt)*l.
% 2.40/2.63  238[0:Inp] ||  -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member1672_mt)*l.
% 2.40/2.63  288[0:Inp] || tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468))* -> .
% 2.40/2.63  296[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) -> ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical)*.
% 2.40/2.63  997[0:Inp] || genlmt(u,v)*+ -> microtheory(u)*.
% 2.40/2.63  1082[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)*+ -> mtvisible(v)*.
% 2.40/2.63  1084[0:Inp] ridgeline_topographical(u) || mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt) -> tptpofobject(u,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468))*.
% 2.40/2.63  1135[0:Res:1084.2,288.0] ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical) || mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)* -> .
% 2.40/2.63  1630[0:SoR:1135.0,296.1] || mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt) mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)* -> .
% 2.40/2.63  4199[0:Res:238.0,997.0] ||  -> microtheory(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)*.
% 2.40/2.63  5138[0:Res:169.0,1082.1] mtvisible(c_tptp_member3993_mt) ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*.
% 2.40/2.63  5160[0:Res:223.0,1082.1] mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt) ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)*.
% 2.40/2.63  5161[0:Res:194.0,1082.1] mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt) ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member3993_mt)*.
% 2.40/2.63  5187[0:Res:140.0,1082.1] mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) ||  -> mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)*.
% 2.40/2.63  5299[0:SSi:5160.0,1.0,4199.0] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)*.
% 2.40/2.63  5301[0:MRR:1630.0,5299.0] || mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)* -> .
% 2.40/2.63  5310[0:SSi:5161.0,1.0,4199.0] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member3993_mt)*.
% 2.40/2.63  5311[0:MRR:5138.0,5310.0] ||  -> mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*.
% 2.40/2.63  5363[0:MRR:5187.0,5187.1,5311.0,5301.0] ||  -> .
% 2.40/2.63  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.40/2.63  Formulae used in the proof : query115 ax1_254 ax1_315 ax1_364 ax1_419 ax1_453 ax1_25 ax1_1127 ax1_1123 ax1_105
% 2.40/2.63  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------