TSTP Solution File: CSR065+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR065+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:18 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 8.63s 2.91s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   25 (  18 unt;   0 nHn;  25 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   36 (   0 equ;  13 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   7 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_129,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-psmvilv9/lgb.p',i_0_129) ).

cnf(i_0_407,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member3993_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-psmvilv9/lgb.p',i_0_407) ).

cnf(i_0_1066,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-psmvilv9/lgb.p',i_0_1066) ).

cnf(i_0_357,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_member3993_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-psmvilv9/lgb.p',i_0_357) ).

cnf(i_0_466,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member235_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-psmvilv9/lgb.p',i_0_466) ).

cnf(i_0_289,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-psmvilv9/lgb.p',i_0_289) ).

cnf(i_0_62,plain,
    ( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468))
    | ~ ridgeline_topographical(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-psmvilv9/lgb.p',i_0_62) ).

cnf(i_0_295,plain,
    ( ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-psmvilv9/lgb.p',i_0_295) ).

cnf(i_0_1065,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-psmvilv9/lgb.p',i_0_1065) ).

cnf(c_0_1076,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_129 ).

cnf(c_0_1077,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member3993_mt),
    i_0_407 ).

cnf(c_0_1078,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
    i_0_1066 ).

cnf(c_0_1079,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_member3993_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
    i_0_357 ).

cnf(c_0_1080,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_member3993_mt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1076,c_0_1077]),c_0_1078])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1081,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member235_mt),
    i_0_466 ).

cnf(c_0_1082,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
    i_0_289 ).

cnf(c_0_1083,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1076,c_0_1079]),c_0_1080])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1084,plain,
    ( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468))
    | ~ ridgeline_topographical(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt) ),
    i_0_62 ).

cnf(c_0_1085,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1076,c_0_1081]),c_0_1078])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1086,plain,
    ( ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
    i_0_295 ).

cnf(c_0_1087,plain,
    mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1076,c_0_1082]),c_0_1083])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1088,plain,
    ( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468))
    | ~ ridgeline_topographical(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_1084,c_0_1085])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1089,plain,
    ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_1086,c_0_1087])]) ).

cnf(c_0_1090,negated_conjecture,
    ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)),
    i_0_1065 ).

cnf(c_0_1091,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_1088,c_0_1089]),c_0_1090]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : CSR065+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 15:14:39 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.48  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.19/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.19/0.48  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 8.63/2.91  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.63/2.91  # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.63/2.91  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.63/2.91  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S048A
% 8.63/2.91  # and selection function SelectComplexPreferEQ.
% 8.63/2.91  #
% 8.63/2.91  # Preprocessing time       : 0.026 s
% 8.63/2.91  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.63/2.91  
% 8.63/2.91  # Proof found!
% 8.63/2.91  # SZS status Theorem
% 8.63/2.91  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.63/2.91  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.63/2.91  
% 8.63/2.91  # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.63/2.91  # User time                : 0.036 s
% 8.63/2.91  # System time              : 0.012 s
% 8.63/2.91  # Total time               : 0.048 s
% 8.63/2.91  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.63/2.91  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------