TSTP Solution File: CSR065+2 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR065+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:04 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.27s 1.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 29 ( 16 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 48 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 37 ( 18 ~; 11 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query115,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query115) ).
fof(ax1_105,axiom,
! [X10] :
( ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)
& ridgeline_topographical(X10) )
=> tptpofobject(X10,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_105) ).
fof(ax1_1123,axiom,
! [X20,X21] :
( ( mtvisible(X20)
& genlmt(X20,X21) )
=> mtvisible(X21) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1123) ).
fof(ax1_419,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member235_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_419) ).
fof(ax1_25,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
=> ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_25) ).
fof(ax1_364,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member3993_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_364) ).
fof(ax1_254,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_254) ).
fof(ax1_315,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3993_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_315) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query115]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
& ~ tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X11] :
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)
| ~ ridgeline_topographical(X11)
| tptpofobject(X11,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_105])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X22,X23] :
( ~ mtvisible(X22)
| ~ genlmt(X22,X23)
| mtvisible(X23) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1123])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( tptpofobject(X1,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468))
| ~ ridgeline_topographical(X1)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( mtvisible(X1)
| ~ genlmt(X2,X1)
| ~ mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member235_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_419]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)
| ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical)
| ~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member3993_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_364]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_254]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3993_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_315]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member3993_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_22]),c_0_16])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),c_0_27]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : CSR065+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 15:00:54 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.27/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/1.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.27/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.033 s
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.27/1.45 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.27/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1063
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses : 70
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 70
% 0.27/1.45 # Processed clauses : 116
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # ...subsumed : 20
% 0.27/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 96
% 0.27/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.27/1.45 # Generated clauses : 82
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 49
% 0.27/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Paramodulations : 82
% 0.27/1.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 91
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 41
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 8
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 42
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 5
% 0.27/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 278
% 0.27/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 259
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 15
% 0.27/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 180
% 0.27/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10755
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/1.45 # User time : 0.029 s
% 0.27/1.45 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Total time : 0.036 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 5472 pages
% 0.27/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.051 s
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof found!
% 0.27/1.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/1.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object total steps : 29
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object clause steps : 16
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object conjectures : 8
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 9
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 8
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 6
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 10
% 0.27/1.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.27/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses : 1133
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1133
% 0.27/1.45 # Processed clauses : 1333
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 46
% 0.27/1.45 # ...subsumed : 34
% 0.27/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 1252
% 0.27/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 13
% 0.27/1.45 # Generated clauses : 2648
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 2429
% 0.27/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Paramodulations : 2648
% 0.27/1.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 1238
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 422
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 39
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 777
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2201
% 0.27/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 3850
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 14
% 0.27/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 98559
% 0.27/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 91217
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 31
% 0.27/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11624
% 0.27/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 11
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 8
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 66745
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/1.45 # User time : 0.124 s
% 0.27/1.45 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Total time : 0.129 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 11392 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------