TSTP Solution File: CSR065+1 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : CSR065+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.45s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR065+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 9 20:06:33 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.20/0.45 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.45 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.45 SPASS derived 68 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 76 clauses.
% 0.20/0.45 SPASS allocated 97708 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.45 SPASS spent 0:00:00.09 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.45 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.20/0.45 0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.45 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.45 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.45 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45
% 0.20/0.45 Here is a proof with depth 6, length 19 :
% 0.20/0.45 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.45 1[0:Inp] || -> mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)*.
% 0.20/0.45 8[0:Inp] || -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt)*r.
% 0.20/0.45 9[0:Inp] || -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member235_mt)*l.
% 0.20/0.45 10[0:Inp] || -> genlmt(c_tptp_member3993_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*r.
% 0.20/0.45 11[0:Inp] || -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member3993_mt)*l.
% 0.20/0.45 14[0:Inp] || tptpofobject(c_tptpridgeline_topographical,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468))* -> .
% 0.20/0.45 15[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) -> ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical)*.
% 0.20/0.45 48[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)* -> mtvisible(v)*.
% 0.20/0.45 49[0:Inp] ridgeline_topographical(u) || mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt) -> tptpofobject(u,f_tptpquantityfn_13(n_468))*.
% 0.20/0.45 57[0:Inp] || genlmt(u,v)* genlmt(v,w)* -> genlmt(u,w)*.
% 0.20/0.45 59[0:Res:1.0,48.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,u) -> mtvisible(u)*.
% 0.20/0.45 60[0:Res:49.2,14.0] ridgeline_topographical(c_tptpridgeline_topographical) || mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)* -> .
% 0.20/0.45 86[0:SoR:60.0,15.1] || mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt) mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)* -> .
% 0.20/0.45 104[0:Res:59.1,86.1] || genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_cyclistsmt) mtvisible(c_tptp_member235_mt)* -> .
% 0.20/0.45 149[0:Res:59.1,104.1] || genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member235_mt) genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_cyclistsmt)*r -> .
% 0.20/0.45 150[0:MRR:149.0,9.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_cyclistsmt)*r -> .
% 0.20/0.45 151[0:NCh:57.2,57.1,150.0,8.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*r -> .
% 0.20/0.45 152[0:NCh:57.2,57.1,151.0,10.0] || genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member3993_mt)*l -> .
% 0.20/0.45 153[0:MRR:152.0,11.0] || -> .
% 0.20/0.45 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.45 Formulae used in the proof : query65 just5 just6 just7 just8 just9 just48 just10 just53
% 0.20/0.45
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------