TSTP Solution File: CSR064+3 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : CSR064+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:02:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.82s 3.02s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.82s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   20 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (  10   ~;   4   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   1 sgn   6   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query164,conjecture,
    ~ genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query164) ).

fof(ax2_529,axiom,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( genls(X3,X4)
     => collection(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_529) ).

fof(ax2_3089,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ~ ( collection(X1)
        & individual(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_3089) ).

fof(ax2_771,axiom,
    individual(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_771) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query164]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X5,X6] :
      ( ~ genls(X5,X6)
      | collection(X5) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_529])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ collection(X2)
      | ~ individual(X2) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_3089])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( collection(X1)
    | ~ genls(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    genls(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml)),c_tptpcol_15_74743),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ individual(X1)
    | ~ collection(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    collection(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    individual(f_urlfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwahwatukeecomafnentertainmentarticles030423ahtml))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_771]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09  % Problem  : CSR064+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.09/0.29  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.09/0.29  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 16:46:25 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.82/3.02  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.82/3.02  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.82/3.02  # Preprocessing time       : 0.144 s
% 0.82/3.02  
% 0.82/3.02  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.82/3.02  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.82/3.02  # Parsed axioms                        : 8006
% 0.82/3.02  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7997
% 0.82/3.02  # Initial clauses                      : 9
% 0.82/3.02  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
% 0.82/3.02  # Processed clauses                    : 11
% 0.82/3.02  # ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.82/3.02  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.82/3.02  # ...remaining for further processing  : 7
% 0.82/3.02  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Generated clauses                    : 2
% 0.82/3.02  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 2
% 0.82/3.02  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Paramodulations                      : 2
% 0.82/3.02  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Current number of processed clauses  : 7
% 0.82/3.02  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.82/3.02  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.82/3.02  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.82/3.02  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4
% 0.82/3.02  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.82/3.02  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.82/3.02  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.82/3.02  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.82/3.02  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 51302
% 0.82/3.02  
% 0.82/3.02  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.82/3.02  # User time                : 0.130 s
% 0.82/3.02  # System time              : 0.014 s
% 0.82/3.02  # Total time               : 0.144 s
% 0.82/3.02  # Maximum resident set size: 19672 pages
% 0.82/3.02  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.82/3.02  # Preprocessing time       : 0.299 s
% 0.82/3.02  
% 0.82/3.02  # Proof found!
% 0.82/3.02  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.82/3.02  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.82/3.02  # Proof object total steps             : 14
% 0.82/3.02  # Proof object clause steps            : 6
% 0.82/3.02  # Proof object formula steps           : 8
% 0.82/3.02  # Proof object conjectures             : 6
% 0.82/3.02  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
% 0.82/3.02  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.82/3.02  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 0.82/3.02  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 0.82/3.02  # Proof object generating inferences   : 2
% 0.82/3.02  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 0.82/3.02  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.82/3.02  # Parsed axioms                        : 8006
% 0.82/3.02  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Initial clauses                      : 8006
% 0.82/3.02  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 8006
% 0.82/3.02  # Processed clauses                    : 8020
% 0.82/3.02  # ...of these trivial                  : 326
% 0.82/3.02  # ...subsumed                          : 336
% 0.82/3.02  # ...remaining for further processing  : 7358
% 0.82/3.02  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.82/3.02  # Backward-rewritten                   : 25
% 0.82/3.02  # Generated clauses                    : 22850
% 0.82/3.02  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 21154
% 0.82/3.02  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 20
% 0.82/3.02  # Paramodulations                      : 22850
% 0.82/3.02  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Current number of processed clauses  : 7332
% 0.82/3.02  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2914
% 0.82/3.02  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.82/3.02  #    Negative unit clauses             : 38
% 0.82/3.02  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4380
% 0.82/3.02  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 21118
% 0.82/3.02  # ...number of literals in the above   : 38190
% 0.82/3.02  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Current number of archived clauses   : 26
% 0.82/3.02  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2486424
% 0.82/3.02  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2325686
% 0.82/3.02  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 357
% 0.82/3.02  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 37437
% 0.82/3.02  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2572
% 0.82/3.02  # BW rewrite match successes           : 25
% 0.82/3.02  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.82/3.02  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 488354
% 0.82/3.02  
% 0.82/3.02  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.82/3.02  # User time                : 1.137 s
% 0.82/3.02  # System time              : 0.039 s
% 0.82/3.02  # Total time               : 1.176 s
% 0.82/3.02  # Maximum resident set size: 67088 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------