TSTP Solution File: CSR062+2 by SPASS---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : CSR062+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:52 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 2.24s 2.41s
% Output : Refutation 2.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : CSR062+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 01:09:50 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 2.24/2.41
% 2.24/2.41 SPASS V 3.9
% 2.24/2.41 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 2.24/2.41 % SZS status Theorem
% 2.24/2.41 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.24/2.41 SPASS derived 3660 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 3702 clauses.
% 2.24/2.41 SPASS allocated 101119 KBytes.
% 2.24/2.41 SPASS spent 0:00:01.99 on the problem.
% 2.24/2.41 0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 2.24/2.41 0:00:00.18 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 2.24/2.41 0:00:00.12 for inferences.
% 2.24/2.41 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 2.24/2.41 0:00:01.30 for the reduction.
% 2.24/2.41
% 2.24/2.41
% 2.24/2.41 Here is a proof with depth 3, length 20 :
% 2.24/2.41 % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.24/2.41 1[0:Inp] || -> mtvisible(c_tptp_member3205_mt)*.
% 2.24/2.41 38[0:Inp] || -> genlmt(c_tptp_member3205_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*l.
% 2.24/2.41 140[0:Inp] || -> genlmt(c_tptp_spindleheadmt,c_cyclistsmt)*r.
% 2.24/2.41 268[0:Inp] || tptptypes_5_387(u,c_pushingwithfingers)* -> .
% 2.24/2.41 486[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt) -> tptptypes_8_390(c_pushingwithfingers,c_tptpcol_15_4027)*.
% 2.24/2.41 997[0:Inp] || genlmt(u,v)*+ -> microtheory(u)*.
% 2.24/2.41 1002[0:Inp] || tptptypes_8_390(u,v) -> tptptypes_7_389(u,v)*.
% 2.24/2.41 1005[0:Inp] || tptptypes_6_388(u,v)* -> tptptypes_5_387(u,v).
% 2.24/2.41 1017[0:Inp] || tptptypes_7_389(u,v) -> tptptypes_6_388(v,u)*.
% 2.24/2.41 1082[0:Inp] mtvisible(u) || genlmt(u,v)*+ -> mtvisible(v)*.
% 2.24/2.41 1135[0:Res:1005.1,268.0] || tptptypes_6_388(u,c_pushingwithfingers)* -> .
% 2.24/2.41 2713[0:Res:1017.1,1135.0] || tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithfingers,u)* -> .
% 2.24/2.41 3276[0:Res:1002.1,2713.0] || tptptypes_8_390(c_pushingwithfingers,u)* -> .
% 2.24/2.41 3277[0:MRR:486.1,3276.0] || mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)* -> .
% 2.24/2.41 4178[0:Res:38.0,997.0] || -> microtheory(c_tptp_member3205_mt)*.
% 2.24/2.41 5127[0:Res:38.0,1082.1] mtvisible(c_tptp_member3205_mt) || -> mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*.
% 2.24/2.41 5168[0:Res:140.0,1082.1] mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) || -> mtvisible(c_cyclistsmt)*.
% 2.24/2.41 5268[0:SSi:5127.0,1.0,4178.0] || -> mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)*.
% 2.24/2.41 5289[0:MRR:5168.1,3277.0] mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) || -> .
% 2.24/2.41 5290[0:MRR:5289.0,5268.0] || -> .
% 2.24/2.41 % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.24/2.41 Formulae used in the proof : query112 ax1_34 ax1_254 ax1_460 ax1_1127 ax1_61 ax1_99 ax1_302 ax1_1123
% 2.24/2.41
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------