TSTP Solution File: CSR061+6 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR061+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:47:14 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 82.64s 68.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 82.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   14 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_594,plain,
    ( reifiablefunction(X1)
    | ~ natfunction(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-39ny9c8f/input.p',i_0_594) ).

cnf(i_0_2349,plain,
    natfunction(f_intervalstartedbyfn_inclusive(X1),c_intervalstartedbyfn_inclusive),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-39ny9c8f/input.p',i_0_2349) ).

cnf(i_0_80,plain,
    ( ~ reifiablefunction(X1)
    | ~ unreifiablefunction(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-39ny9c8f/input.p',i_0_80) ).

cnf(i_0_3243,plain,
    unreifiablefunction(c_intervalstartedbyfn_inclusive),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-39ny9c8f/input.p',i_0_3243) ).

cnf(c_0_3248,plain,
    ( reifiablefunction(X1)
    | ~ natfunction(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_594 ).

cnf(c_0_3249,plain,
    natfunction(f_intervalstartedbyfn_inclusive(X1),c_intervalstartedbyfn_inclusive),
    i_0_2349 ).

cnf(c_0_3250,plain,
    ( ~ reifiablefunction(X1)
    | ~ unreifiablefunction(X1) ),
    i_0_80 ).

cnf(c_0_3251,plain,
    reifiablefunction(c_intervalstartedbyfn_inclusive),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3248,c_0_3249]) ).

cnf(c_0_3252,plain,
    unreifiablefunction(c_intervalstartedbyfn_inclusive),
    i_0_3243 ).

cnf(c_0_3253,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3250,c_0_3251]),c_0_3252])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : CSR061+6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 16:52:10 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 64.17/64.43  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 64.17/64.43  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 64.17/64.43  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 64.17/64.43  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 82.64/68.73  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 82.64/68.73  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 82.64/68.73  # Preprocessing time       : 0.079 s
% 82.64/68.73  
% 82.64/68.73  # Proof found!
% 82.64/68.73  # SZS status Theorem
% 82.64/68.73  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 82.64/68.73  # Proof object total steps             : 10
% 82.64/68.73  # Proof object clause steps            : 6
% 82.64/68.73  # Proof object formula steps           : 4
% 82.64/68.73  # Proof object conjectures             : 0
% 82.64/68.73  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 0
% 82.64/68.73  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 0
% 82.64/68.73  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 82.64/68.73  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 82.64/68.73  # Proof object generating inferences   : 2
% 82.64/68.73  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 82.64/68.73  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 82.64/68.73  # Parsed axioms                        : 3559
% 82.64/68.73  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 82.64/68.73  # Initial clauses                      : 3559
% 82.64/68.73  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 82.64/68.73  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 3559
% 82.64/68.73  # Processed clauses                    : 8343
% 82.64/68.73  # ...of these trivial                  : 1191
% 82.64/68.73  # ...subsumed                          : 300
% 82.64/68.73  # ...remaining for further processing  : 6852
% 82.64/68.73  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 9
% 82.64/68.73  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 82.64/68.73  # Backward-subsumed                    : 57
% 82.64/68.73  # Backward-rewritten                   : 78
% 82.64/68.73  # Generated clauses                    : 18431
% 82.64/68.73  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 16580
% 82.64/68.73  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 80
% 82.64/68.73  # Paramodulations                      : 18422
% 82.64/68.73  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 82.64/68.73  # Equation resolutions                 : 9
% 82.64/68.73  # Propositional unsat checks           : 1
% 82.64/68.73  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 82.64/68.73  # Current number of processed clauses  : 6708
% 82.64/68.73  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2769
% 82.64/68.73  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 82.64/68.73  #    Negative unit clauses             : 188
% 82.64/68.73  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3751
% 82.64/68.73  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11285
% 82.64/68.73  # ...number of literals in the above   : 23952
% 82.64/68.73  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 82.64/68.73  # Current number of archived clauses   : 135
% 82.64/68.73  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6601965
% 82.64/68.73  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4119310
% 82.64/68.73  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 316
% 82.64/68.73  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 136223
% 82.64/68.73  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 82.64/68.73  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 413
% 82.64/68.73  # BW rewrite match successes           : 38
% 82.64/68.73  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 82.64/68.73  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 82.64/68.73  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 217197
% 82.64/68.73  
% 82.64/68.73  # -------------------------------------------------
% 82.64/68.73  # User time                : 1.172 s
% 82.64/68.73  # System time              : 0.023 s
% 82.64/68.73  # Total time               : 1.196 s
% 82.64/68.73  # ...preprocessing         : 0.079 s
% 82.64/68.73  # ...main loop             : 1.117 s
% 82.64/68.73  # Maximum resident set size: 39028 pages
% 82.64/68.73  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------